Scientific Services

If rhinos had PR teams, they’d probably campaign for something like: “Love me for my wrinkles, not my horn.” Unfortunately, their iconic horns—made of the same stuff as our fingernails—have become one of the most sought-after wildlife products on the planet. And that has turned them into prime targets in a high-stakes, global crime saga.

But a new Science study brings fresh hope—and fresh thinking. It shows that dehorning rhinos, when done smartly and on a regular basis, can massively reduce poaching. Even better, the study proves that when scientists and rangers team up, rhino conservation gets a significant upgrade.

This is the story of how a team of boots-on-the-ground rangers and data-crunching scientists saved hundreds of rhinos—armed not just with tranquilizers and tracking dogs, but with evidence, trust, and teamwork

A dehorned rhino lays with her calf watching moments before waking up from a safe veterinary procedure. Dehorning is done while the animal is fully immobilised, with trained rangers carefully sawing off the horn just above the growth layer—similar to clipping a human nail. The process is painless and takes just a few minutes. Once complete, the horn is secured in a government-approved vault, while the rhino returns to the wild, less horn but very much alive—continuing its life in the bush, safer from poachers.

Dehorning: What the Study Shows

Between 2017 and 2023, 11 wildlife reserves in southern Africa worked with researchers to track rhino poaching incidents and anti-poaching efforts. This included over 2,200 dehorned rhinos, nearly 2,000 poaching incidents, and more than $74 million in anti-poaching spending.

They looked at everything from ranger patrols, fences, cameras, sniffer dogs, integrity management, helicopter teams, rhino tracking technology, and more. Eleven different interventions were measured. But the results were surprisingly clear: rhino dehorning stood out as the only intervention consistently associated with large reductions in poaching.

Here’s what the numbers said:

• On reserves where all rhinos were dehorned, poaching dropped by 75%.
• In seven reserves that dehorned abruptly, poaching fell by 78% almost immediately.
• The risk of poaching for horned rhinos was 13% annually, compared to just 0.6% for dehorned rhinos.

That’s a 95% drop in risk—with only 1.2% of the total budget spent on dehorning. Now that’s return on investment.

Why Dehorning Works

Unlike traditional anti-poaching measures, dehorning tackles the reward side of the crime equation. No horn = no payout.

The study found that poacher incursions also dropped significantly after dehorning. The message was getting through – rhinos with less horn aren’t worth the risk.

It’s also harder to undermine. A dehorned rhino is a clear, physical deterrent—less likely to fail due to insider corruption, technical glitches, or the impossibility of bribing a rhino to regrow its horn faster than normal!

Not a Silver Bullet, but a Powerful Tool

Before we get too excited, there are caveats. Horns regrow, meaning rhinos need to be dehorned every 18–24 months. And if the job isn’t done thoroughly or regularly, poachers may still target the horn stumps, as seen in Kruger National Park.

Between 2022 and 2023, Kruger lost over 100 dehorned rhinos—mainly because roughly half of the population had been dehorned at the time, and horn regrowth was enough to make it worthwhile for poachers.

So yes, dehorning works—but it must be done consistently and as part of a broader toolkit.

What About the Other 10 Interventions?

Alongside dehorning, the study also evaluated ten other commonly used anti-poaching tools across the 11 reserves. These included:

• Fences
• Surveillance cameras (including AI-powered systems)
• Ranger Patrols
• Rapid response teams
• Sniffer and tracking dogs
• Security control rooms
• Polygraph testing of staff
• Helicopter support
• Detection zones (e.g., monitoring tracks on roads or riverbeds)
• Community engagement activities

Interestingly, none of these interventions showed a statistically significant link to reduced poaching rates in the system-wide analysis. However, that doesn’t mean they were ineffective or unimportant.

Unlike dehorning, which directly reduces the value of the rhino to poachers, these other measures aim to increase the risk of being caught. They focus on detecting, deterring, or responding to poaching activity, rather than altering the desirability of the rhino as a target.

As a result, their effects are often indirect and heavily dependent on context. This makes them harder to detect as clear, measurable reductions in poaching rates.

Still, their contribution to rhino protection was significant in other ways. Rangers and detection dogs helped arrest more than 700 poachers, seriously disrupting trafficking networks.

Polygraph testing led to the dismissal of 129 staff members suspected of working with criminal syndicates. Surveillance cameras detected intrusions, guided ranger teams, and supported enforcement responses.

These tools may not have consistently lowered poaching across all reserves, but they played a vital role in uncovering corruption, tightening internal controls, and chipping away at the broader system of criminality that supports the illegal trade in rhino horn.

Why Collaboration Mattered

One of the best parts of this study? It wasn’t a scenario where “scientists drop in, write papers, and leave”.

Instead, rangers, reserve managers, and researchers co-designed the work together. They ran structured interviews, data workshops, and real-time tracking of what was working. This kind of partnership helped ensure the findings were practical—not just theoretical.

It’s a strong example of how local knowledge, operational experience, and scientific methods can work together to solve complex problems.

Dehorning Helps—but It’s Not the Endgame

The study team is clear: dehorning is not the long-term solution. It buys us time—but we must use that time to tackle deeper issues.

Here’s what the future of smarter rhino conservation looks like:

1. Support More Than Law Enforcement

Enforcement is necessary—but not enough. We need education, diplomacy, detection, demand reduction, and development support all working together.

2. Let Innovation Bloom

Good ideas don’t always come from policy headquarters. We need room for experimentation—from community rhino guardians to tech-enabled horn tracking to economic incentives for local landowners.

3. Tackle Root Causes

Illegal demand for rhino horn, limited economic opportunities for people living next to rhino reserves, and organized crime networks are the real drivers. Conservation alone cannot solve this—it requires international cooperation, legal reform, and long-term investment in local economies.

4. Give Communities a Say

Too often, the people who live near rhino reserves have no voice in how rhinos should be protected, and no share in the benefits. That must change. Shared responsibility creates shared value—and stronger protection.

5. Unlock Safe Space

Africa has the space to support more rhinos. The problem is, much of it is unsafe or politically unstable. By improving governance, infrastructure, and partnerships, we can open up new safe havens for growing populations.

6. Know the associated Risks of Dehorning

Broadscale dehorning also brings practical challenges:

• How do you track which rhinos were dehorned and when?
• What happens to the horn stockpiles? Burn them? Store them? Sell them?
• What is the impact on the rhino health when regularly chased and darted?
• Could dehorning shift poaching behaviour, making poachers more desperate and violent?
• If multiple rhinos must be killed to get enough horn from stumps, might that raise risks for female rhinos and future calves?

These questions don’t have simple answers—but we must keep asking them.

Final Thoughts: The Smarter Way Forward

Rhino conservation isn’t about brute force anymore. It’s about smart choices, shared responsibilities, and adaptable solutions. This study proves that dehorning can be part of that strategy—when combined with care, coordination, and science.

But the real heroes aren’t just the ones holding chainsaws or crunching code. They’re the rangers who patrol at dawn, the vets and pilots who fly in to help, the community members who choose protection over poaching, and the researchers who listen before they analyze.

With continued teamwork between scientists and rangers, rhinos stand a real chance—not just to survive, but to thrive.

And maybe—just maybe—to keep their horns too.

A Note of Tribute

This work stands not only as a scientific breakthrough but also as a testament to the power of visionary leadership. The collaborative approach that made this study possible—uniting rangers, scientists, managers, and policymakers—flourished under the guidance of the late Sharon Haussmann, CEO of the Greater Kruger Environmental Protection Foundation (GKEPF).

Sharon believed deeply in the value of evidence-based conservation, grounded in trust, shared purpose, and mutual respect. Her leadership helped build the bridges between boots on the ground and brains working on the data. The results speak for itself—not just in the reduction of poaching, but in the strength of the partnerships formed.

Her legacy lives on in every rhino saved, every data point collected, and every moment where science and stewardship meet in the field. This study is one of many chapters written in her name—and one that will continue to inspire those committed to protecting wild places and the people who care for them.

Inspiring hearts through rhinos, Sharon Haussmann’s light lives on—etched in every hornless silhouette, and every life saved.