Hine wrote:EIt is also time we stopped blaming an illness or the more famous one an absus on a tooth or leg that has led to the wild behaviour.
Hine, you know what. I already like you after just reading one post of yours. I agree wholeheartedly with you on this above statement.
As for the revenge part, p@m is right. The lioness might have been injured in the incident. Trails rangers' primary goal is the safety of tourists. It would've been very unfortunate had the lioness got injured in the skirmish, but if that is the case, one would not want any animal to roam around injured.
The aftermath of the injury would not just cause pain and non comfort for her, but it would also lead to her not being able to fend or care for her cubs at all.
What I don't like in this instance is that two wrongs might have been used to make a right. It sickens me, but sometimes nothing else can be done. Trails bring another dimension to experiencing wildlife. Without trails we would be less better off as the most important thing about it, namely the small things we can't experience from a game drive would be lost. The smaller things of the veld are the most important things. Without the smallest of thing, Kruger would be unable to coexist and with Trails we get to experience and understand those smaller, fascinating and crucial parts.
But Trails are risky. Incidents with animals are imminent. But take into consideration how few incidents happen. The safety precautions are very good. No ranger likes to have something like this happening to him. It will haunt him forever...