Thank you Chris for the article, it was very informative.
I have only recently become more aware and involved in the issue of poaching and have found the statistics both horrifying and heartbreaking. I have often felt so intensely angry at the senseless slaughter that my first reaction was also "shoot to kill" is the only true solution!
However, after reading that article and a few others see:
www.globaliniative.net - a report called: Ending Wildlife Trafficking; I am wondering whether engaging local communities around the various parks and reserves could be a more sustainable solution, even though far more complex and complicated?
I wonder if by focussing on the growth and connection between communities and parks/reserves and the animals we are trying to protect, rather than on the WAR, we may be able to find a more strategic solution to this issue? This is not to say that we do not continue to protect our wildlife in the way we are currently doing, but we begin to listen to the other key players in the situation and engage the one area we have not seemed to have yet - local communities.
In the report, by Anette Hubschle, I mentioned above, the following statement really made me stop:
"The *** has its own doctor, its own policeman, its own helicopter, its own land and there are rangers that protect it. We don't have these things. If the *** goes extinct tomorrow, maybe we can finally get these things." I was gobsmacked by this statement. While I wanted to rage at this, I also suddenly realised that if we REALLY want to solve this problem, whether these players are right or wrong, this is how they feel. By just saying that is not right and lets up the anti with more violence, I don't think we are going to get anywhere other than just more violence.
As I said earlier, I am still new to this and I am not "on the ground", so I realise that these are just my intellectual musings from a very safe distance. I would really appreciate any and all feedback, stories, comments and facts.
*** Warrior 28