Past Tusker - Duke
Moderator: RosemaryH
Re: Tuskers
Hi Tollie,
Wow! A sighting from 2007. I'm sure the memory is still clear in your mind! Indeed a privilege.
I will move your post to Past Tusker - Duke shortly. Thank you for sharing this.
You can follow and read up on all the upcoming tuskers currently being monitored in the SANParks Emerging Tuskers Project right here on the forums SANParks Tuskers
Wow! A sighting from 2007. I'm sure the memory is still clear in your mind! Indeed a privilege.
I will move your post to Past Tusker - Duke shortly. Thank you for sharing this.
You can follow and read up on all the upcoming tuskers currently being monitored in the SANParks Emerging Tuskers Project right here on the forums SANParks Tuskers
Rose
- wildtuinman
- Legendary Virtual Ranger
- Posts: 5607
- Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 10:27 am
- Location: 2545_2815
- Contact:
Re: Inaccurate report around the finding of Duke's first broken tusk
Hi Rosemary.
The report completely omits the two guys who actually found Duke in the first place on that afternoon just before he broke his tusk and who played the important role in specifying Duke's last location when his tusk snapped.
Here is the far more actual story.
https://www.sanparks.org/news/duke-breaks-left-tusk
The report completely omits the two guys who actually found Duke in the first place on that afternoon just before he broke his tusk and who played the important role in specifying Duke's last location when his tusk snapped.
Here is the far more actual story.
https://www.sanparks.org/news/duke-breaks-left-tusk
Latest lifers (687): Racket-tailed Roller, Mottled Spinetail, Eurasian Curlew, Red Knot, Boulder Chat
Re: Inaccurate report around the finding of Duke's first broken tusk
Bruised ego making you nasty WTM? No need to be insulting!wildtuinman wrote: ↑Mon Aug 26, 2024 7:06 am Who wrote this article? This is why comprehension tests are important in school.
Please remove the article or contact me to get the facts right and correct it.
https://www.sanparks.org/conservation/p ... st-tuskers
- Dalene
Re: Inaccurate report around the finding of Duke's first broken tusk
Hi wildtuinman,
The contents of the article, under the general section of Duke on the website, are a synopsis of the information received. There are no inaccuracies there but rather as you indicated, from your point of view an omission, as only the person who directly called the rangers name was included.
I have spoken to SANParks and this will be edited to rather not single out a particular member in the summary.
Attachments are provided along with the article, which give more detailed information and also reference the Duke quest in more detail - e.g. Extracts from ranger diary, email and article
The contents of the article, under the general section of Duke on the website, are a synopsis of the information received. There are no inaccuracies there but rather as you indicated, from your point of view an omission, as only the person who directly called the rangers name was included.
I have spoken to SANParks and this will be edited to rather not single out a particular member in the summary.
Attachments are provided along with the article, which give more detailed information and also reference the Duke quest in more detail - e.g. Extracts from ranger diary, email and article
Rose