Skip to Content

General Photography Chat

Discuss and share your wildlife photography, filming and equipment
User avatar
Salva
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
Posts: 578
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 10:41 am
Location: The country of compromises

Unread post by Salva » Tue Dec 05, 2006 1:22 pm

DuQues wrote:I usually use ± 3 kilo's of rice. Easily handled, and at the last day you can make one of the staff happy. An added bonus.


Exactly the same here!
U lacht en U heeft gelijk dat U lacht maar het is niet om mee te lachen

gwendolen
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Posts: 2163
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 5:57 pm

Unread post by gwendolen » Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:36 am

Hi forumites,

Just to let you know that we have started a new Group Pool at Flickr. After the succes of the KNP group pool, with 41 members, DinkyBird has started a Kgalagadi group pool

User avatar
DuQues
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 14520
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?

Unread post by DuQues » Fri Feb 02, 2007 2:14 pm

Just a heads-up for people a little short on millimeters on their lens: Buy a 100-400 cm lens now!
Looks a little odd though.
Not posting much here anymore, but the photo's you can follow here There is plenty there.

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c

User avatar
bucky
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1225
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:41 pm
Location: Gauties .

Unread post by bucky » Fri Feb 02, 2007 2:20 pm

Not bad , although with a 1.6 camera that gives you a fairly decent 640 cm on the long end .
Pretty decent for photographing insects at long range :lol:

User avatar
DuQues
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 14520
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?

Unread post by DuQues » Tue Feb 06, 2007 10:29 am

D40 and D80 users... :yaya:
Nikon has brought out new firmware for you, repairing some errors in the menu's, and more importantly the noiselevels seem to be down after installing it. I wanted to post links to the software, but the Nikon site is soooooo slow that I gave up. Yet another reason to use Canon! :wink:
Not posting much here anymore, but the photo's you can follow here There is plenty there.

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c

Readles
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:55 pm

Canon 400D

Unread post by Readles » Sat Mar 31, 2007 10:02 pm

Hi All

I have just got a Cannon 400D. Previously I used a film camera and had a 100-500 mm lens. I am looking to buy a lens for my NEW digital and was hoping that someone can give me some advice in terms of if you are starting your lens collection, what would you buy. The cost is not of real concern, however, i would only buy one lens so it must be flexible. It would only be for game and bird photo's

Readles

User avatar
richardharris
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 456
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 3:04 pm
Location: Nottinghamshire UK

Unread post by richardharris » Sun Apr 01, 2007 11:22 am

If cost is no problem, go for one of the long Canon lenses. My preference is the 500 F4 IS - the 600 is too heavy (the 500 is bad enough). This is a superb wildlife lens.

However it is too long for a number of situations so don't throw away your other lenses just yet. You will probably want a couple more to cover a wider range eventually.

I am sure many would recommend the 100-400 L lens; personally I was never very impressed with it. However I have been very impressed with the 70-200F4L IS, a new lens from Canon and that would be my second recommendation if the first is too much/large etc.

Richard

User avatar
bert
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Posts: 14295
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:02 pm
Location: mind in SA, body in The Netherlands

Unread post by bert » Sun Apr 01, 2007 1:20 pm

I will recommend the 100-400 L with IS
Very versatile and can be used with 1.4 converter.
But , must agree with Richard
Glass on the 500 is sharper
But only a very little sharper

But the great thing about the 100-400 is that you have freedom while making a composition.

And a landschape zoom lens.

User avatar
DuQues
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 14520
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?

Unread post by DuQues » Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:17 am

For versatility go for the 100-400. If you want to use an extender on it make sure your body is one of the 1-series (1D MKIII comes to mind) as you'll lose AF otherwise. And stick to the 1.4 extender only.

Otherwise the 300 f/2.8 is probably the sharpest lens available, but for birding that may be a little to short in a lot of cases, even with an extender.
Not posting much here anymore, but the photo's you can follow here There is plenty there.

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c

BushCall
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Aug 29, 2006 11:37 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Unread post by BushCall » Mon Apr 02, 2007 9:14 pm

peterpiper wrote:Just to add my five cents worth.

If you get the 100 -400 don't plan on using a converter with it. May be possible but results will not be great. Still, it's a good versatile lens for most situations. If you are very fussy about sharpness, get a fixed focal length lens like the 300 F4 or 400 F5.6. Not as versatile but definately sharper. The 500 F4 is overkill for a 400D. Only go that route if you are planning on upgrading your body, -selling your wifes' -:) and turning pro.


Peterpiper apparently the reason the results are not sharp is that the C 100-400 is a 5.6 and will loose Auto focus with a more powerful convertor than 1.4. You need to go to f4 to get the full versatility out of convertors and sharpness. We sold our 80-400 VR 5.6 for that reason and sold the Landy and got the sharpest tele zoom I have ever seen the 200-400 f4 which works with all convertors. We now reckon that is sharper in many situations than the awesome 70- 200 F2.8. The only drawback is that often you need to suddenly go below 200 and you can with the Canon. If you say the 100-400 is not as sharp as it could be then you should see the Canon 70-200 f2.8. Our friends have one and its killer and the rivalry between the 2 men is really funny at times!!!
If Nikon goes full frame I know we will have to somehow invest in a 500 or 600f4 for the birds as the 400 will no longer be 600

User avatar
DuQues
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 14520
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?

Unread post by DuQues » Fri Apr 06, 2007 9:57 am

For those of you who want to do startrails, have a look at this article.
Not posting much here anymore, but the photo's you can follow here There is plenty there.

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c

User avatar
Skillie
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 374
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: South Africa
Contact:

Unread post by Skillie » Fri Apr 06, 2007 3:04 pm

Not sure where you are, Bert, here in UK we see few adds on telly for either (except when a new version is brought out such as Canon400D) but they are advertised a lot in mags, etc in the popular press eg Sunday Times magazine. (Not sure if I'm allowed to mention names! :redface: )You are right, though, they have the capital to advertise and hence more sales.
I think I am more influenced by word of mouth and recommendations than by advertising when choosing a product to buy. :lol:
Member Stiffnecks
Member LIT club

User avatar
Ollie
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 198
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2005 2:38 am
Location: California

Unread post by Ollie » Fri Apr 06, 2007 7:21 pm

Have to agree with Skillie, we don't see cameras advertised on TV, mainly in the rags, perhaps more word of mouth, or should I say word of photographic forum......

User avatar
DuQues
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 14520
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?

Unread post by DuQues » Wed Apr 25, 2007 11:45 am

A little heads/up for Canon 400D users: there is a new firmware for your camera. You can download it here: http://www.canon.co.jp/Imaging/dc/e4kr3105.exe

This has changed:
This firmware update (Version 1.0.5) incorporates the following fixes and improvement.:
- Fixes the printing of lens names when using PictBridge.
- [Redeye 1] can now be selected when connecting with specific printers.
- Improves the reliability of communication with the Speedlite 380EX.
Not posting much here anymore, but the photo's you can follow here There is plenty there.

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c


Return to “Wildlife Photography Enthusiasts”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Webcam Highlights

Addo
Submitted by Karin Mitton at 17:55:31
orpen
Submitted by Ton&Herma at 20:36:27
satara
Submitted by Trrp-trrrrrrrr at 20:36:39
nossob
Submitted by moose at 20:00:38