Skip to Content

Telephoto Zoom Lens Advice

Discuss and share your wildlife photography, filming and equipment
User avatar
Posts: 2929
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:44 am
Location: On the edge of heaven

Re: 80-200 Nikon F2.8d ed or Sigma 150-500

Unread postby michel367 » Mon Jul 26, 2010 7:08 pm

Definitely the 150 - 500.
Otherwise you will soon end up with buying yet another lens or a teleconverter because you just do not have the desired reach. :thumbs_up:

User avatar
Josh of the Bushveld
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1510
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark

Re: 80-200 Nikon F2.8d ed or Sigma 150-500

Unread postby Josh of the Bushveld » Tue Jul 27, 2010 7:43 am

Horrace, I went from using the Sigma 170-500mm to using a 80-200mm F2.8 (push-pull type, i.e. old) with a Kenko 2x teleconverter. This past weekend I tried the Sigma again as comparison. My biggest problem with the t/c combo is the really slow auto-focus. This is due to it being an old lens with internal focus, and to using it with a teleconverter. I tried the Sigma again because of the auto-focus issue. I have also had focus calibration issues with my 80-200mm which may have been caused by using it with a t/c (I started a thread on ODP about this, you can follow the discussion there if you want).

If you choose the 80-200mm, you will need to use it with a teleconverter. If you buy a newer version of the 80-200mm, I don't think you'll have the same problems as I have had (slow AF, focus calibration), and you might be able to use a Nikon t/c (though I'm not sure on that).

To be honest, I think I'd first try find a 2nd hand Sigma, and try it out. If you're not happy with it, resell it and look at other options.
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal

User avatar
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2010 9:59 pm
Location: New Zealand

Re: 80-200 Nikon F2.8d ed or Sigma 150-500

Unread postby BushNuts » Wed Jul 28, 2010 10:23 am

Hi Horrace,

Tough call and one that will likely give you a headache before long. Like photography, everything is a balance. You need to balance aperture with shutter speed and all depending on which way you want to go, you'll end up sacrificing in the other. You want distance, the Sigma. You want a fast lens with good glass, the f/2.8.

Personally, and if your budget allows for it, I would go for the new 70-200mm f/2.8G VRII lens from Nikkor and consider getting a 2x TC at a later stage. That will drop your aperture to f/5.6 and give you 400mm reach, backed by good glass and the VRII will counter act the drop in aperture allowing you to get good action shots.

My 2c worth.
"What makes a simple picture a true photograph, is the infusion of a story, emotions and memories."

31/12 - 01/01 : KNP - Talamati
02/01 - 05/01 : KNP - Satara

Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 478
Joined: Thu Jan 22, 2009 11:29 pm
Location: Okavango

Re: 80-200 Nikon F2.8d ed or Sigma 150-500

Unread postby o-dog » Wed Jul 28, 2010 12:48 pm

I have this exact lense (80-200 2.8 ED)...its perfect for mammal photography in private game reserves when you go off road and I thought it wouldnt be that great for Kruger but I was get so many opportunities with so many relxed animals in KNP that you will have a lot of fun getting high quality images throughout the day.
Ofcourse about 30% of the time you wish you had extra zoom so every now and then I was wishing for a greater zoom.
If you more into bird photography I would get the 150-500 but having had the other lense since 2006 its only been a pleasure and has exceeded expectations drastically.

If you are interested in getting into panoramic photography or already do it then the 80-200 once again produces the goods with flying colours.

I must say that I am looking to get into bird photography and when the budget allows I will get a lense with greater zoom perhaps even a fixed 300mm with a converter but havnt thought about it extensively yet.

Mana Pools: 11th - 20th Oct
KNP: 27th Nov - 5 Dec

User avatar
Posts: 66
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 1:32 pm
Location: Johannesburg

Re: 80-200 Nikon F2.8d ed or Sigma 150-500

Unread postby fazekma » Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:04 pm

It depends what you want to achieve with each lens - if you need the reach I would suggest going with the Sigma. I have tried the Nikon 80-200 f2.8 with 2X tele-convertor and the results are not good, even with the new Nikon TC 2X III converter.

You can see a comparison here" onclick=";return false; between the Nikon 80-200 plus 2X TC and the Nikon 80-400

If a pro uses a certain lens we need to pay attention as they tend to stick to the big expensive heavy glass but Robert O'Toole took this pic with a Nikon D700 and Sigma 150-500...
Photographer with Bald Eagles, Homer, AK
Image copyright 2010/Robert O’Toole Photography
This image was created by Robert with the Sigma 150-500mm lens (hand held at 275mm) and the Nikon D-700. ISO 1000: 1/1250 sec. at f/8.
Source: ... letin-334/" onclick=";return false;

Technique is very important and a good photographer can take sharp photographs with consumer lenses, you don’t have to have an expensive pro lens!

Return to “Wildlife Photography Enthusiasts”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

Webcam Highlights

Submitted by Oumie at 18:27:54
Submitted by Oumie at 18:38:20
Submitted by Oumie at 18:39:37
Submitted by Pjw at 15:52:46