Skip to Content

Should the names of members banned be made public

Tell us what we can do better, need to clear the air, voice your concern or provide feedback about the forum

Should the names of people banned be made public on the forums?

Poll ended at Tue Aug 16, 2011 5:32 pm

Yes
57
63%
No
33
37%
 
Total votes: 90

User avatar
wanda
Guru
Guru
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:02 am
Location: PRETORIA

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby wanda » Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:14 pm

Richprins wrote:Hello, Wanda, and nice to see you on the forums again! :thumbs_up:

As you quoted me, I shall respond as follows:

To continue your analogy, I have abundant experience of teenagers, being a teacher, and have found that parents are to blame for most problem children!

This could be either too much or too little discipline, for example, and the mods are doing a fine job, I agree!

But I don't know if they are the "parents" here, and most forumites are not children? :wink:

I don't quite understand the rest of your post regarding the topic...so what is your opinion on banned members being named?

RP I hope you know that the parents vs children statement was just a quip. As for publishing or not publishing the names of banned forumites I, unfortunately, do not have an opinion. I thought that the poll was set up to establish this question but judging from the comments of those who posted it would seem that the matter cannot be settled that easily. I am sitting this one out. Unfortunately I cannot help you on what you say you don't understand because I don't know which part you don't understand. I thought I was being clear and simple - I certainly stayed away from my signature five line sentences. :lol:
Bush Happy wrote:Are you for real DuQues??????

You seriously need to get a grip!!!
That is uncalled for. This is the kind of language that gets people hot under the collar and does not assist in constructive debate.

Bush Happy wrote:My question was deleted in RP's thread(that was deleted/censored) but I will ask it again:

How often is a Moderators performance reviewed??
I am not sure where this is coming from, unless there is something I am missing in previous posts. However, I will answer. We have constant discussions with the Mods and are aware of what they do all the time. When they make a decision that requires intervention, we do so. That for me is enough performance evaluation. It is not like they have to now fill in a balanced scorecard sheet, they are volunteers afterall. They don't even get remunerated for the work they do and the long hours they put in. What is your gripe really?
wanda mkutshulwa
Head of Communications
South African National Parks (SANParks)

User avatar
Baffers
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 2126
Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 10:13 pm
Location: Slightly Off Center

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Baffers » Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:43 pm

Bush Happy wrote:So, because he was passionate about conservation, SANPARKS are considering naming and shaming him, and as DuQues has threatened, will have a trouble finding a job??


Exactly at what stage was anyone threatened? As far as I can see DuQues said that the choice of naming people could have the aftermath of them having trouble with certain job interviews.

But then again... Maybe I am just not "passionate" enough to read it as a threat

:roll: :hmz:
At the end of it all you don't want to go into the grave peacefully and quietly in well preserved body... You want to go sort off skidding in sideways, full of bruises and scratches saying: "Man what a ride!!!"

User avatar
wanda
Guru
Guru
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:02 am
Location: PRETORIA

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby wanda » Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:58 pm

Bush Happy wrote:Sure have Brummie!

Lets take Forumite X, who was recently banned. He had a history on this forum of sharing and imparting his vast wealth of knowledge on matters relating to SANPARKS. He did extensive research and had some wonderful threads.

He was passionate!!

Then, an issue arose that he felt was worth speaking out against.

He was branded a 'purist, a 'rascist' etc in the public media, not just on these forums.

So, it's fair to say he felt slightly aggrieved.

So, because he was passionate about conservation, SANPARKS are considering naming and shaming him, and as DuQues has threatened, will have a trouble finding a job??


BushHappy I must say this and be very emphatic about it. Being passionate is not a license to be rude and overbearing - not that I am saying your person is because I do not even know who you refer to. Neither does being knowledgeable about a subject give you liberties beyond "mere mortals". Everyone, no matter how important they think they are, must be sanctioned when they behave in a manner that is anti-social. This is not a forum about expertise but a platform to discuss conservation issues and SANParks, no matter how little information people have. Noone, and I repeat, noone will be intimidated by anyone in this forum no matter the contribution of that person. Nobody put a gun to that participant's head and forced them to participate. They did it voluntarily and you shall not hold us at ransom for their departure. I would like to assume that everyone in this forum is an adult or a near adult and so fully understands and appreciates the consequences of their actions. We are not here to teach people how to behave and neither are we here to take abuse from people who cannot hold their tempers. If they are used to doing that with their friends, family and acquaintances, unfortunately we are not kind of crowd. Here everyone will respect others and will conduct themselves with dignity and restraint. Above all you will not make unproven allegations against any member of this forum. Please stop verbally abusing other forumites and I say that with absolute restraint.
wanda mkutshulwa

Head of Communications

South African National Parks (SANParks)

User avatar
wanda
Guru
Guru
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:02 am
Location: PRETORIA

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby wanda » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:04 pm

And one more thing Bushhappy, SANParks is not considering "naming and shaming" anyone. Get your facts straight before you make statements. It was explained in earlier posts that the reason the Mods chose to have this poll is because there have been calls from others to do so. Now, in your mind which part in this says SANParks is considering naming and shaming banned people? This is a public forum. Be carefull of what you say and who you accuse. If you are so unhappy being here really why are you stressing yourself so much? In fact why are you stressing others with your unhappiness?
wanda mkutshulwa

Head of Communications

South African National Parks (SANParks)

Bush Happy
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:53 am

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Bush Happy » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:08 pm

Wanda, just to clarify:

but a platform to discuss conservation issues


Only if it does not put SANPARKS in a bad light. Right?

That is uncalled for. This is the kind of language that gets people hot under the collar and does not assist in constructive debate.



I have been issued a warning privately but as I am being publicly cautioned as well, and as I have not received an answer from the Mods yet, what is the difference between what I said and what SANPARKS wrote:

Please grow up. Show some gratitude


They look kind of similar to me??

Bush Happy
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:53 am

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Bush Happy » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:12 pm

As I said to the Mods who asked a simialr question to yours
:
If you are so unhappy being here really why are you stressing yourself so much? In fact why are you stressing others with your unhappiness?


It is because I am unhappy with the direction SANPARKS is taking, and if I don't voice opposition to it, who will??

I am unhappy because I don't like being censored! There is an article on News24 today, discussing the hotel, yet we are not allowed to. Conservation bodies are opposed to it, yet we can't say a thing! I will not be complicit in this, and by my very silence, I will be.
Last edited by Bush Happy on Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
saraf
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8986
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 3:19 pm
Location: Portsmouth, England

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby saraf » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:15 pm

As an example of what Duco was saying.

An undergraduate applied for an internship here recently. Before the interview we did a quick internet search and in half an hour came up with 8 pages of information on her, her activities and dislikes and likes. We are IT professionals yes, but not trained investigators or HR professionals. We did nothing illegal or went to anywhere any member of the public couldn't go to. So people are checked on, its not a threat, its just something to be aware of.
Want to say Thank You or Well Done to a fellow 'mite? Why not nominate them for a Kudu?

Bush Happy
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:53 am

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Bush Happy » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:17 pm

Perhaps this will answer your question Wanda

All that is required for evil to prosper is for good people to do nothing

User avatar
saraf
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8986
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 3:19 pm
Location: Portsmouth, England

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby saraf » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:27 pm

Bush "Happy", I think you've made your point.

And people have had their say on here about the hotels. The thread was open for 2 years, had 54743 views and 3999 replies. Everyone had their chance to comment.
Want to say Thank You or Well Done to a fellow 'mite? Why not nominate them for a Kudu?

Bush Happy
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:53 am

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Bush Happy » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:36 pm

And a few were banned for their stance, yes?
Last edited by DinkyBird on Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: See rule # 12.

User avatar
saraf
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 8986
Joined: Sun Jan 16, 2005 3:19 pm
Location: Portsmouth, England

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby saraf » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:47 pm

Bush Happy, I am Proudly British and have no idea what the Afrikaans means.

Also, I know of only one person who has been banned and that was a number of years ago. I do not know why the person was banned and I found out about the ban because I was carrying out voluntary tasks on behalf of the forum for which banned members were excluded, for obvious reasons.

But I have enough confidence in the Mods through my interaction with them in the 6.5 years I have been a member to know that they followed stipulated procedures and that any bans, if issued, were as a result of members not abiding by the rules they agree to by signing up to be a member.
Want to say Thank You or Well Done to a fellow 'mite? Why not nominate them for a Kudu?

User avatar
DinkyBird
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 46737
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 5:54 pm
Location: Across the Equator, otherside the Atlantic

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby DinkyBird » Wed Aug 24, 2011 3:58 pm

Bush Happy wrote:And a few were banned for their stance, yes?
No. No one has been banned for their stance on the hotels. This has been explained over and over on the forums by the moderators.

Have a read through the rules of the forums ... it is very clear there why and how members get banned.
Sawubona
Dalene

User avatar
Stark
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
Posts: 2257
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 1:52 am
Location: Arizona, USA

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Stark » Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:05 pm

I believe that the handling of the hotel issue by SANParks and on the forum (mods and mites alike) has caused frustration and has been a catalyst for bad behavior that has lead to bannings. L

BUT

Said bad behavior was a choice and the actions of the banned were their own choices and their own responsibility.

On the hotel issue as a catalyst, many new developments have come up that deserve comment as the issue isn't a static one. We certainly wouldn't lock the poaching thread for the same reason, although not much new has been said there in years.
"Smooth seas do not make skillful sailors." West African Proverb

User avatar
DinkyBird
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 46737
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 5:54 pm
Location: Across the Equator, otherside the Atlantic

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby DinkyBird » Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:10 pm

DinkyBird wrote:
Bush Happy wrote:And a few were banned for their stance, yes?
No. No one has been banned for their stance on the hotels. This has been explained over and over on the forums by the moderators.

This is in fact an excellent example of why members have suggested to the forum admin to consider naming banned members and the reasons for the bans.

The forum admin do not disclose or reveal why a member was banned. However nothing stops the banned member telling a very one sided story. And as a result misinformation is posted on the forums.
Sawubona
Dalene

User avatar
bert
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Posts: 17202
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:02 pm
Location: mind in SA, body in The Netherlands

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby bert » Wed Aug 24, 2011 4:38 pm

Please quote your source Bush Happy
Its a rule on this forum


Return to “Chill Room ”