Skip to Content

Your Opinion

Share and discuss your images (strictly SANparks related)
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 3:53 pm

Your Opinion

Unread postby Dawid2005 » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:53 am

Hi All

I have a general question, I am still relatively new in photography and was just wondering about this. I am looking at getting a longer lens for myself mostly for wildlife and I am also not really in the mood to change lenses for the time when I want to take pics of the family so I am considering getting another body as well. I do not want to go into the discussion of what makes to get as I already sort have my mind made up on this.

So here is the question the what in your opinion will be the best:
1. Getting a new lens and buying second hand body or
2. Getting a new body and then buying second hand lens.

Your opinions will be greatly appreciated.

User avatar
lion queen
Forum Assistant
Forum Assistant
Posts: 13338
Joined: Tue Oct 06, 2009 5:03 pm
Location: Upington RSA

Re: Your Opinion

Unread postby lion queen » Thu Dec 05, 2013 8:09 am

I would go with option one........ :thumbs_up:
You only live once, but if you do it right, once is enough - Mae West

User avatar
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:00 am
Location: Die Poort!

Re: Your Opinion

Unread postby badprop_za » Thu Dec 05, 2013 9:05 am

Agree with Lion Queen. Go with option 1.

Why don't you also look for a second hand lens and body?

In terms of what lens, the 70-300 range of lenses seems best bang for your buck (sorry, couldn't help myself :doh: ). Something to consider is also that you can rent lenses. For my KNP excursions, I rent a Nikon 200-400 f/4 VR lens. It costs me about R3k for 9 days. I would not be able to afford such a lens, but renting makes it possible to use pro lenses at affordable rates.
Why do time fly when you are having fun?

KNP - May'14 done and dusted :cry:

KNP - 14 Aug'15 to 21 Aug'15 :dance:

Return to “SANParks Camera Club”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests