Skip to content

SANParks.org Forums

View unanswered posts | View active topics






Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 2
 [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Infinity ????
Unread postPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 7:57 am 
Offline
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 3080
Location: Cape Town-but dreaming of KTP
Please help....

When focussing on infinity which f-stop should I be using ???
My research into this topic is confusing :?
Some say F22 and some say wide open.
:huh:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Infinity ????
Unread postPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 8:03 am 
Offline
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Posts: 1896
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark
Caracal wrote:
Please help....

When focussing on infinity which f-stop should I be using ???
My research into this topic is confusing :?
Some say F22 and some say wide open.
:huh:

I might be missing something.
Your aperture shouldn't have anything to do with your focus. Your aperture should be controlled solely to achieve a particular shutter speed (in S or Tv) or to achieve a specific depth of field.

_________________
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Infinity ????
Unread postPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 8:05 am 
Offline
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:45 pm
Posts: 4954
Location: southern gauteng
Big f-stop number for landscapes , small f-stop number for separating subject from background (taken from a Getaway on line newsletter)

_________________
KNP is sacred. I am opposed to the modernisation of Kruger and from the depths of my soul long for the Kruger of yesteryear! 1000+km on foot in KNP incl 56 wild trails.200+ nights in the wildernessndloti-indigenous name for serval.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Infinity ????
Unread postPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 9:32 am
Posts: 817
Location: Northwold with KTP on my mind...
ndloti wrote:
Big f-stop number for landscapes , small f-stop number for separating subject from background (taken from a Getaway on line newsletter)


Agree, your AV will depend on lighting conditions, shutter speed, DOF, etc etc.

It really is up to you, not dependant on focussing. Obviously when you are at infinity, you most probably are shooting subjects / landscape some distance from you, so generally your AV shoul be about 8 or higher, but there's no rule as far as I know.

_________________
KNP: 14 June: Skukuza Camping
15 -21 June: Letaba Camping


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Infinity ????
Unread postPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:42 am 
Offline
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 10:44 pm
Posts: 3080
Location: Cape Town-but dreaming of KTP
Thanks everybody
Yes I understand F-stops and depth of field...

So what is the point then of focussing on infinity.....I thought everything was in focus..depth of field wise...when on infinity :? Wouldn't I be getting the same effect then on F22 for instance ???

In other words I don't think I understand the purpose of infinity.

When, how and why should we use infinity ?????


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Infinity ????
Unread postPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:53 am 
Offline
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Posts: 1896
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark
Infinitiy is a fictitious pount of focus. Effectively the lens is focused 'very far away', i.e. at the end of its focus range.

I'm not sure why you're getting confused, but focus and aperture are completely orthogonal - i.e. they are not connected and changing one has no effect on the other.

The point of foscusing at infinity is to focus very far away, e.g. for landscape shots.

Asking 'why would you want to focus at infinity' is like asking 'why would you want to focus on the bird 2 metres away'

_________________
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Infinity ????
Unread postPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:10 am 
Offline
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:02 pm
Posts: 17093
Location: mind in SA, body in The Netherlands
Understand your confusion caracal
But why use autofocus for landscapes F22?

Dont think that the infinity/autofocus/landscapes should be problem
F22 and shoot. Can still use autofocus, but it might hunt searching for a autofocus point.

So i would suggest. Manual focus, bean bag or manual with the image stab on.

_________________
Submit your Images


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Infinity ????
Unread postPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:22 am 
Offline
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Posts: 17943
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?
Check this page and print the chart(s) for your lens(es).

_________________
Arriving currently: The photos from our trip! Overhere! :yaya:

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Infinity ????
Unread postPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:37 am 
Offline
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Posts: 1896
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark
Hyperfocal distance is a new term for me. I'll have to look it up.

I guess focus point (on the lens) and depth of field are not orthogonal (at the hyperfocal distance)

_________________
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Infinity ????
Unread postPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 9:32 am
Posts: 817
Location: Northwold with KTP on my mind...
The only time I have really use the infinity mark on my lenses is when I am shooting landscapes and focus manually, but even then I focus most of the time on the 1/3 plane auto focus.

The only other real time I use the infinity mark is when shooting in the dark, especially lightning that is quite far away. The lens can't auto focus on a dark subject so far away, thus the infinity mark gives me a reference for me to know my shot will be in focus. I still play around with my apperture / ISO / shutter speed etc.which is obviously not related to my focussing degree.

_________________
KNP: 14 June: Skukuza Camping
15 -21 June: Letaba Camping


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Infinity ????
Unread postPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 12:09 pm 
Offline
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
User avatar
Award: Quiz Whiz of the Year (2013)
Joined: Tue Dec 23, 2008 5:22 am
Posts: 21365
Location: Midway between the infinite and the infinitesimal!
Award: Musketeer of the Year, Quiz Whiz of the Year (2012)
Focussing on infinity does not allow one to maximise the depth of field. This should be done by focussing on a distance that allows infinity to be just in focus (based on the depth of field the aperture will cover); that way, the maximum part of the picture - from infinity to as close as possible - will be in focus. In many of the older cameras, there were gradations on the lens itself that allowed one to do this with ease. I don't know about the modern cams.

_________________
EVERYBODY'S TR!
TR: A NEW DAY IS S-OWN
TR: NECTAREAN NICETIES OF THE NORTH
TR: PRIMEVAL PLEASURE

"Outside of a dog, a book is a man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read." (Groucho Marx)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Infinity ????
Unread postPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:51 am
Posts: 2159
This is my biggest gripe with digital cameras and technology! :wall: In days gone by you would HAVE to know the basics pricipals of light and a whole lot of other things like "Hyperfocal Distance" and an old favourite, "The Inverse Square Law". :shock: :whistle:

Now days everyone has become a "photographer" simply because you spend bucks, get a camera that can think halfway for you and you get alrightish results. Now when you try something new, you don't have a clue what to do or don't understand a word of the instructions, because you have never heard of, or learnt the terminology and used it in practice.

Anyone one ever heard of "Scheimflug's Law"? :whistle:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Infinity ????
Unread postPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 1:57 pm 
Offline
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Posts: 1896
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark
Sprocky wrote:
This is my biggest gripe with digital cameras and technology! :wall: In days gone by you would HAVE to know the basics pricipals of light and a whole lot of other things like "Hyperfocal Distance" and an old favourite, "The Inverse Square Law". :shock: :whistle:

Now days everyone has become a "photographer" simply because you spend bucks, get a camera that can think halfway for you and you get alrightish results. Now when you try something new, you don't have a clue what to do or don't understand a word of the instructions, because you have never heard of, or learnt the terminology and used it in practice.

Anyone one ever heard of "Scheimflug's Law"? :whistle:

I'll admit I haven't heard of some of those terms (and I'm one for technicalities). Please point out more holes in my knowledge :)

_________________
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Infinity ????
Unread postPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 3:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:51 am
Posts: 2159
:hmz: The seven in your head. :twisted: Just joking!!!!! :lol:

There are lots of terms and calculations that used to be part of the photographic training, not sure if that stuff is still taught. Self proclaimed photographers will hardly ever get anywhere close to this jargen unless they do a reputable photographic course.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Infinity ????
Unread postPosted: Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:15 pm 
Offline
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Posts: 1896
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark
Which sparks the 'philosophical' question in my head: does one need to know these techniques to take good pictures? (From a creativity point of view). Yes, sometimes you do need a technical technique to achieve an affect (like depth of field) - you can't paint without knowing about paints and media etc.

Personally, I think I focus too much on the technical and not enough on taking photos.

(Yes, I did know about the law of inverse squares, and I read up on Scheimflug's Law which I found interesting)

_________________
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

Webcams Highlights

Addo Nossob Orpen Satara
Addo Nossob Orpen Satara
Submitted by Kiepersol at 20:35:27 Submitted by patries at 18:54:25 Submitted by Anonymous at 20:45:23 Submitted by avidspotter at 15:34:36