Skip to Content

Post-processed Photos

Share and discuss your images (strictly SANparks related)
User avatar
Josh of the Bushveld
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1904
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark

Post-processed Photos

Unread postby Josh of the Bushveld » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:11 pm

Hi all,
For the first time I tried some post-processing of images. All I did was crop and clone out some branches that clouded the image. I'd like your opinion whether the cleaning up was successful, and whether I've made the crop too tight (i.e. degraded quality too much). I used the GIMP for all processing and it was all done on the JPEGs.

Both shots were taken last weekend, in Welgevonden Game Reserve (adjoining Marakele NP).

Bar-throated Apalis
Image

Striped Kingfisher:
Image
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal

User avatar
RUMURUTI
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1868
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Milano (Italy) - IT ALL STARTED WITH A FOOTSTEP!
Contact:

Re: Post-processed Photos

Unread postby RUMURUTI » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:25 pm

ho joshilewis,
Not bad for a start.
I do this sort of thing every day and it takes a while to get a hand of it.

I can see the cloning on left of the kingfisher pic. A little advice, if GIMP allows it of course!, set your cloning tool between 50 and 75% transparency and not at 100%. This will give you a smother result, in particular when it gets to skies and clustered colours.
"You can leave Africa but Africa never leaves you"
LIFE IS MADE OF GOOD AND BAD THINGS, I TAKE THE GOOD AND YOU CAN KEEP THE BAD!!!
Andy Benaglia

User avatar
Josh of the Bushveld
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1904
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark

Re: Post-processed Photos

Unread postby Josh of the Bushveld » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:30 pm

Thanks for the advice Andy, I will use it.
I did try to soften the cloning by cloning with a 'pencil sketch' brush, and then smudging it after.
As far as I know, the GIMP should offer everything Photoshop does. I have also come across a new UI for it which emulates PS, in terms of menu structures and key shortcuts.
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal

User avatar
Josh of the Bushveld
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1904
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark

Re: Post-processed Photos

Unread postby Josh of the Bushveld » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:31 pm

Should I post the originals as well?
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal

User avatar
oddesy
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
Posts: 3183
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:57 pm
Location: Randburg, SA

Re: Post-processed Photos

Unread postby oddesy » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:35 pm

They look quite good, i prefer the kingfisher though :thumbs_up: maybe try sharpen the Bar-throated Apalis a bit? I usually use lightroom so i dont clone anything out so i cant comment on that, and i have only seen GIMP once.

I used to use photoshop but found that lightroom was far better for me and now very seldom use PS :D

I saw them in the flash thread maybe you could just put a link
The beginning of knowledge is the discovery of something we do not understand.

"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." Aristotle

User avatar
oddesy
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
Posts: 3183
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:57 pm
Location: Randburg, SA

Re: Post-processed Photos

Unread postby oddesy » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:37 pm

Maybe this could be a before and after type thing?
The beginning of knowledge is the discovery of something we do not understand.

"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." Aristotle

User avatar
Josh of the Bushveld
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1904
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark

Re: Post-processed Photos

Unread postby Josh of the Bushveld » Fri Dec 04, 2009 5:41 pm

oddesy wrote:They look quite good, i prefer the kingfisher though :thumbs_up: maybe try sharpen the Bar-throated Apalis a bit? I usually use lightroom so i dont clone anything out so i cant comment on that, and i have only seen GIMP once.

I used to use photoshop but found that lightroom was far better for me and now very seldom use PS :D

I saw them in the flash thread maybe you could just put a link

Thanks for the compliment.

The photos in the flash thread are from the series but different shots :)
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal

User avatar
RUMURUTI
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1868
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Milano (Italy) - IT ALL STARTED WITH A FOOTSTEP!
Contact:

Re: Post-processed Photos

Unread postby RUMURUTI » Sat Dec 05, 2009 12:07 am

Evening joshilewis, as I said today fiddling with pictures is my everyday bread and I enjoy every minute of it. Here is an example of what you can do to save a good picture, cloning where it's needed!, and given it that extra touch to make it good enough for print.

This is the original picture - 400 mm!
Image
Pretty soft on the focus side and too many branches cluttering.

This is the final result, 20 minutes work!, no colour correction but a good go at pruning a few branches and twigs. Look at the beak of the left bird and the tail of the right one!
Image

I work a lot with Photoshop CS4 which is by far the best around the market today.

Please give me your opinion, thanks.
"You can leave Africa but Africa never leaves you"
LIFE IS MADE OF GOOD AND BAD THINGS, I TAKE THE GOOD AND YOU CAN KEEP THE BAD!!!
Andy Benaglia

User avatar
carolynn
Posts: 370
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 9:21 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Re: Post-processed Photos

Unread postby carolynn » Sat Dec 05, 2009 7:29 am

Joshilewis - this is all Greek to me, but sounds really fun to do - could you please post the original images too? :?
Live each day as if it's your last... and one day you'll be right!

User avatar
PAPA SMURF
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 180
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 10:46 pm
Location: Calitzdorp, Little Karoo

Re: Post-processed Photos

Unread postby PAPA SMURF » Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:06 pm

Hi RUMURUTI
This is a great photo but I would take it a bit further.
I would clone out the stick in frount of the left hand bird and also clone out a portion of the stick between the two birds. My reason for this is that the two bird would then be "looking" into "clean" area without obstructions.
The right hand bird has a nice "eye highlight" and if you lasoo the eye, feather 1 pix and then sharpen it , then the highlight may become more promenant. You could also push up the brightness (curves or layers) a tad.
This is my 2c worth - not a crit but some shared thoughts
MY get up and go has just got up and gone
Be Positive and Keep Smiling
Terry

User avatar
RUMURUTI
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1868
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Milano (Italy) - IT ALL STARTED WITH A FOOTSTEP!
Contact:

Re: Post-processed Photos

Unread postby RUMURUTI » Sat Dec 05, 2009 9:50 pm

Hi Papa Smurf, Thanks for the advise. Tried it out and must say looks clean.
I don't like touching pictures too much but and generally have a go at them for printing purposes.

Here's a corrected version, the eye looks definitely better!
Image
"You can leave Africa but Africa never leaves you"
LIFE IS MADE OF GOOD AND BAD THINGS, I TAKE THE GOOD AND YOU CAN KEEP THE BAD!!!
Andy Benaglia

User avatar
Switchback
Posts: 817
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 9:32 am
Location: Northwold with KTP on my mind...

Re: Post-processed Photos

Unread postby Switchback » Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:42 pm

joshilewis wrote:Hi all,
All I did was crop and clone out some branches that clouded the image. I'd like your opinion


Hi JS,

I can give you tons of opinions on post processing, but there's one aspect you mentioned that stings me a bit... The part you mentioned you cloned out braches... I FIRMLY do not believe in manipulating wildlife shots. I do, however enhance images meaning cropping, lighten, darken, tweak saturation etc etc, but I do not put in or take anything away. I keep mine the way I shot it.

If you enter your shots into competitions, they almost always ask for you ORIGINAL file to check out if you manipulated or just enhanced your shot.

From reading this thread you're not the only one manipulating, and they may stone me now, but hey, that's just me, I like to keep things "natural". In the end of the day that one GREAT shot is going to mean a lot more... :thumbs_up:
KNP: 14 June: Skukuza Camping
15 -21 June: Letaba Camping

User avatar
Josh of the Bushveld
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1904
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark

Re: Post-processed Photos

Unread postby Josh of the Bushveld » Mon Dec 07, 2009 2:59 pm

Sure, I agree with you from a purist's point of view. I will say that in the two shots posted above, the branches that were cloned out were not in front of the bird, they were in the periphery of the image in both cases. I will post the originals soon, but I'm having an issue with external drive (yay!).

I have however read quite a bit of comment on the Internet about manipulating nature shots. A lot of people say that by taking a photograph, you're manipulating the scene anyway, (white balance, perspective distortion due to focal length etc), so in any case there is no such thing as a 'true to life' or 'realistic' image.

This is the first time I've post-processed any images.

Switchback wrote:If you enter your shots into competitions, they almost always ask for you ORIGINAL file to check out if you manipulated or just enhanced your shot.

As far as I know (open to be proven wrong), there is no way to definitively prove that an image has not been altered since it left the camera. (Sure, things like cloning may be detectable to a degree, but if its done well enough, one can't prove it.)
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal

User avatar
DuQues
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 17941
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?

Re: Post-processed Photos

Unread postby DuQues » Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:16 pm

There are plenty ways to see if an image has been altered....
As we are planning to run the annual photocompetition again I'm not going to list them, but you can trust my words....

And only silly people shoot in jpeg, so we ask for the original RAW and...
Arriving currently: The photos from our trip! Overhere! :yaya:

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c

Sprocky
Posts: 2159
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:51 am

Re: Post-processed Photos

Unread postby Sprocky » Mon Dec 07, 2009 3:19 pm

I must say that I agree with Switchback 100%. :thumbs_up: I do not clone anything on a wildlife shot, all that I do is levels and sharpening.


Return to “SANParks Camera Club”