Skip to Content

Photos for Criticism

Share and discuss your images (strictly SANparks related)
Scipio
Posts: 4758
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:22 am

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Scipio » Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:52 pm

here is two tatally different ones, :thumbs_up:

Image

Image
Last edited by Scipio on Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Josh of the Bushveld
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1904
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Josh of the Bushveld » Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:56 pm

Scipio wrote:here is two tatally different ones, :thumbs_up:

[img]...[/img]

[img]...

I'd crop out the empty sky on the left.
Unfortunately the light has let you down on this one, with the stump's shadow falling on the bird and being very prominent. Part of its neck, face and body is also in shadow.
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal

Scipio
Posts: 4758
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:22 am

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Scipio » Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:00 pm

Just fixed the second one, btw, this was on foot. :tongue:

User avatar
Josh of the Bushveld
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1904
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Josh of the Bushveld » Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:06 pm

Scipio wrote:Just fixed the second one, btw, this was on foot. :tongue:

Nice action shot. Did you have to change your trousers afterward?

Colour's good, lights a bit harsh but I guess you don't always have much choice. If possible, I would have tried to wait for it to come out from behind the bush. I'd also maybe crop out the bush on the left?
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal

Scipio
Posts: 4758
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:22 am

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Scipio » Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:11 pm

I would have tried to wait for it to come out from behind the bush


Now thats pushing it. :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
Josh of the Bushveld
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1904
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Josh of the Bushveld » Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:13 pm

Scipio wrote:
I would have tried to wait for it to come out from behind the bush


Now thats pushing it. :lol: :lol: :lol:

:)
Or side-stepped to the right to get a clear view ;)
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal

User avatar
Switchback
Posts: 817
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 9:32 am
Location: Northwold with KTP on my mind...

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Switchback » Thu Nov 26, 2009 7:38 pm

Scipio,

With the vulture shot, I would've cropped the tree stump out... Just my way of looking at thing, as I like to give the animal something to look at. At the moment, you bird is smack bam in the middle and attention is drawn to the tree...
KNP: 14 June: Skukuza Camping
15 -21 June: Letaba Camping

User avatar
Mike1916
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:43 pm
Location: Sungulwane Hills Game Lodge, Hluhluwe

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Mike1916 » Thu Nov 26, 2009 11:11 pm

Sorry for the late Reply

JL i understand what you are saying and truth be told i took the photo because i liked how the trees almost framed the Restaurant area at Pretoriaskop :D It is a photo i took last year December and have come a long way in composition since then :thumbs_up:

Two very stupid questions but how do you go about changing depth of field and what does it actually do? :redface:
Sustainability is not something we do in addition to..........., it is about the manner in which we do everything

User avatar
Josh of the Bushveld
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1904
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Josh of the Bushveld » Fri Nov 27, 2009 7:38 am

Mike1916 wrote:Sorry for the late Reply

JL i understand what you are saying and truth be told i took the photo because i liked how the trees almost framed the Restaurant area at Pretoriaskop :D It is a photo i took last year December and have come a long way in composition since then :thumbs_up:

Fair enough, and glad to hear you've been progressing :)

Mike1916 wrote:Two very stupid questions but how do you go about changing depth of field and what does it actually do? :redface:

No such thing as a stupid decision.

Unfortunately I don't have time right now to give a full description, but in the meantime, read this.

Basically, depth of field is how deep the plane of focus is, i.e. the range of objects that appear in focus in your image. It is controlled by aperture. The wider the aperture (smaller F-stop), the shallower the depth of field. Also see here.
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal

Sprocky
Posts: 2159
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:51 am

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Sprocky » Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:04 am

Sprocky wrote:Amputation is a no no in nature shots.(Back legs and bottom of front legs)
Distracting branch in foreground.
Wasted space to the left and top of subject.
Do you want more? :whistle:



GREAT SHOT, :thumbs_up: I only gave the above to convince myself that it is not a good shot because I never took it. :twisted:

User avatar
Josh of the Bushveld
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1904
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Josh of the Bushveld » Fri Nov 27, 2009 8:07 am

Switchback wrote:Scipio,

With the vulture shot, I would've cropped the tree stump out... Just my way of looking at thing, as I like to give the animal something to look at. At the moment, you bird is smack bam in the middle and attention is drawn to the tree...

I'd agree with this after another look.
Also, the tree is 'amputated'.
I would crop it so it becomes a portrait orientation.
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal

User avatar
Caracal
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Posts: 3086
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 10:44 pm
Location: Cape Town-but dreaming of KTP

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Caracal » Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:26 pm

Just having fun with reflections and bubbles.

Image

Image

Image

I was wondering if there was any way I could improve on these. :hmz:

User avatar
Josh of the Bushveld
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1904
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Josh of the Bushveld » Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:46 pm

Again, what are you trying to achieve?

What lens did you use for these? And lighting?

The first thing I would suggest is to maybe look at the white balance
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal

User avatar
Caracal
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Posts: 3086
Joined: Thu Oct 05, 2006 10:44 pm
Location: Cape Town-but dreaming of KTP

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Caracal » Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:55 pm

Again, what are you trying to achieve?
Well I was trying to capture our reflections in the bubbles.

What lens did you use for these? And lighting?
70-200 mm 2.8 IS..just the natural lighting..it was in a forest so pretty dark , tried flash but obviously it was seen in the bubble. :doh:

The first thing I would suggest is to maybe look at the white balance

I fiddled with that..not sure which I preferred. :roll:

User avatar
Siobain
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
Posts: 5215
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 9:38 pm
Location: Johannesburg

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Siobain » Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:57 pm

Nice, Caracal :thumbs_up:
He is rich or poor according to what he is, not according to what he has. ~Henry Ward Beecher


Return to “SANParks Camera Club”