Skip to Content

Photos for Criticism

Share and discuss your images (strictly SANparks related)
User avatar
DuQues
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 17942
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby DuQues » Sat Nov 21, 2009 12:07 pm

Great photo! 8)
Switchback wrote:If I could have a small reflector next to the bird reflecting some light back onto it, it would have been perfect... :doh:

And the bird would move, so you'd need to turn the reflector, and miss the shot.... ;)
In this case, grey(ish) weather, you might think of using flash? That puts the twinkle in the eye, and lightens up your wave. Even the build-in flash of most cameras will do just that bit.
You don't need a full flash, just a fill in one, say -2 stops...
Arriving currently: The photos from our trip! Overhere! :yaya:

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c

User avatar
Switchback
Posts: 817
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 9:32 am
Location: Northwold with KTP on my mind...

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Switchback » Sat Nov 21, 2009 2:20 pm

Yip, I have a SB900 and a SB600, but was actually going for a silhouette type shot, when the wave came, the bird turned and flapped it's wings after it got a lekker fright! :lol:

B5S, nice shot! Also would have included the jaw + more space to the right for him to "walk into". His eye is smack bam in the middle now, so would've cropped it to put the eye more to the top left corner. DOF very good! :thumbs_up:
KNP: 14 June: Skukuza Camping
15 -21 June: Letaba Camping

User avatar
Josh of the Bushveld
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1904
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Josh of the Bushveld » Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:41 am

Switchback, great shot.
I agree with the others, I think the only thing I can see detracting from the photo is the light, but there wasn't too much you could do about that unfortunately.

Maybe next time I'll offer to hold the reflector, as long as it isn't under a lion ;)
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal

User avatar
Josh of the Bushveld
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1904
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Josh of the Bushveld » Sun Nov 22, 2009 10:41 am

Sorry to harp on it: are we promoting one thread per photo for criticism? Lets set an example to be followed :P
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal

User avatar
big5spotter
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 969
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 7:10 pm
Location: Ruimsig, Gauteng

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby big5spotter » Sun Nov 22, 2009 6:36 pm

How about this one?

Image
'When someone shares something of value with you, and you benefit from it, you have a moral obligation to share it with others'


3 Male lions hunting buffalo: The Movie!!!

Sprocky
Posts: 2159
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:51 am

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Sprocky » Sun Nov 22, 2009 6:45 pm

Two quick comments.

Subject too central.
Dust bunny (dirt on sensor) above the bird close to the top edge.

Sorry for sounding harsh, but those are basics in the digital and wet film world.

User avatar
big5spotter
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 969
Joined: Thu Apr 16, 2009 7:10 pm
Location: Ruimsig, Gauteng

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby big5spotter » Sun Nov 22, 2009 7:36 pm

Sprocky wrote:Sorry for sounding harsh, but those are basics in the digital and wet film world.


Best way to improve :thumbs_up:
'When someone shares something of value with you, and you benefit from it, you have a moral obligation to share it with others'


3 Male lions hunting buffalo: The Movie!!!

User avatar
oddesy
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
Posts: 3183
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:57 pm
Location: Randburg, SA

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby oddesy » Sun Nov 22, 2009 7:39 pm

for the dust you can spot it out with photoshop lightroom etc or im not sure if the nikon has dust mapping capability or cleaning, maybe a nikon user can help :hmz:

Nice pic :clap: but like sprocky said a bit too central if you put the bird closer to the left looking out would make a huge difference
The beginning of knowledge is the discovery of something we do not understand.

"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." Aristotle

User avatar
iNkwazi
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 769
Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:29 pm
Location: Northcliff, SA

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby iNkwazi » Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:55 pm

B5S, I also have a D80 and have got dust on the sensor. It's a problem that's difficult to avoid (esp in dusty conditions) when you are changing lenses. You can take it to Nikon headoffice in Midrand. They clean it for you then and there, with no charge.
It takes one tree to make 10,000 matches, but one match to burn 10,000 trees.

User avatar
Lockie
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1230
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:10 pm
Location: New Brunswick, Canada

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Lockie » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:11 pm

can I play...I just love criticism :lol: ...this was taken in Golden Gate and I was intrigued by the skull effect in the rock. The camera was a Nikon D40x, my BIL's camera and I really had no idea how to use it. Does the vegetation in the foreground take away from the overall mountains in the background?

Image

User avatar
Switchback
Posts: 817
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 9:32 am
Location: Northwold with KTP on my mind...

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Switchback » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:18 pm

Hi Lockie,

Only once you mentioned the skull effect did I notice it. You could've placed more emphasis on it by composing differently - maybe more sky, less foreground and not the little piece of "koppie" on the right corner.

You caught the light very good though and a good colour balance. Porbably used a larger F number as most is in well focus - can't really create a nice effect using a shallow DOF with sky behind your object :)

All in all, I'd just recompose.
KNP: 14 June: Skukuza Camping
15 -21 June: Letaba Camping

User avatar
Lockie
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1230
Joined: Sun Jul 22, 2007 6:10 pm
Location: New Brunswick, Canada

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Lockie » Sun Nov 22, 2009 9:30 pm

I was miffed SB that I cut off the top of the mountain...interesting about the Koppie...but thought it wasn't a gate without the other side :lol:
amateurs :roll:
and f stops???it was set on auto :redface: Only camera I ever used before was of the cardboard kind :lol:

User avatar
Switchback
Posts: 817
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 9:32 am
Location: Northwold with KTP on my mind...

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Switchback » Mon Nov 23, 2009 9:07 pm

Lockie wrote:...interesting about the Koppie...but thought it wasn't a gate without the other side :lol:


:thumbs_up: :lol:
KNP: 14 June: Skukuza Camping
15 -21 June: Letaba Camping

User avatar
oddesy
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
Posts: 3183
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 4:57 pm
Location: Randburg, SA

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby oddesy » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:10 pm

Would appreciate some views on this pic of mine :D
Image
The beginning of knowledge is the discovery of something we do not understand.

"We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit." Aristotle

Sprocky
Posts: 2159
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:51 am

Re: Photos for Criticism

Unread postby Sprocky » Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:22 pm

Amputation is a no no in nature shots.(Back legs and bottom of front legs)
Distracting branch in foreground.
Wasted space to the left and top of subject.
Do you want more? :whistle:



GREAT SHOT, :thumbs_up: I only gave the above to convince myself that it is not a good shot because I never took it. :twisted:


Return to “SANParks Camera Club”