Skip to Content

Lens Advice Needed

Discuss and share your wildlife photography, filming and equipment
User avatar
delboysafa
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 218
Joined: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:48 pm
Location: From East London S.A., but living in Surrey, UK

Unread postby delboysafa » Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:52 pm

Welcome, you wont regret it. Sharp and Fast (as fast as it needs to be outdoors)

User avatar
DuQues
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 17941
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?

Unread postby DuQues » Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:52 am

He deserves this lens indeed! Good choice, you'll come to love that lense...
Arriving currently: The photos from our trip! Overhere! :yaya:

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c

User avatar
bert
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Posts: 17198
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:02 pm
Location: mind in SA, body in The Netherlands

Unread postby bert » Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:27 am

bucky wrote:Looking forward to snapping duke with it , He deserves a quality lens after all :D .

:lol: :lol: :lol:
You wont be disappoined

User avatar
bucky
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1539
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:41 pm
Location: Gauties .

Unread postby bucky » Wed Oct 04, 2006 9:09 pm

1 bad thing with this lens , I believe It is going to lead me on the path to crave the bad things in life , like more expensive L glass .

Took some more shots today in good sun , the saturation and clarity is brilliant , worth every penny :D

User avatar
madach
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 771
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:55 pm

Unread postby madach » Wed Oct 04, 2006 11:54 pm

bucky wrote:1 bad thing with this lens , I believe It is going to lead me on the path to crave the bad things in life , like more expensive L glass .

I've been using the 300m f/2.8 L IS for two years now. I can really recommend it :wink:

User avatar
DuQues
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 17941
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?

Unread postby DuQues » Thu Oct 05, 2006 8:55 am

The Canon EF 500mm f/4L IS USM is a super lens too! And at €5849.00 (say R58490.00) quite a steal! :lol:
Arriving currently: The photos from our trip! Overhere! :yaya:

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c

User avatar
peterpiper
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 6:46 pm
Location: In the studio for now

Unread postby peterpiper » Thu Oct 05, 2006 9:26 am

DuQues wrote:The Canon EF 500mm f/4L IS USM is a super lens too! And at €5849.00 (say R58490.00) quite a steal! :lol:


That's what you would think, but I see it is advertised on a local site here for a mere R76000.00 Yup, would definately have to resort to 'steal' before I could get one of those.
Home is where you hang your @

User avatar
bucky
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1539
Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:41 pm
Location: Gauties .

Unread postby bucky » Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:10 am

peterpiper wrote:
DuQues wrote:The Canon EF 500mm f/4L IS USM is a super lens too! And at €5849.00 (say R58490.00) quite a steal! :lol:


That's what you would think, but I see it is advertised on a local site here for a mere R76000.00 Yup, would definately have to resort to 'steal' before I could get one of those.


:lol: :lol:.

To much money , anyways - after using the 70-200 F4 L , I was blown away , there is just no comparison with my older regular lenses .
The quitness,accuracy and speed of focus are VERY good , the image quality is fantastic , absolutely amazing .

Now I am going to save like mad to get the 400 mm F5,6 L before my kgalagadi trip in december to replace the sigma 170-500 .

User avatar
DuQues
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 17941
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?

Unread postby DuQues » Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:33 am

Should be easy. October, november, december. Three months to save R 14,815.00 (VAT Incl)! :lol:
Arriving currently: The photos from our trip! Overhere! :yaya:

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c

Hedrus
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:54 am
Location: Pretoria SA

Unread postby Hedrus » Tue Oct 10, 2006 5:32 pm

Price for 500 F4 IS as of today at latest exhange rates are R57000.00
I am also aware of a used one at R45000.00 excellent condition.
Somebody will bring it to me Thursday.

User avatar
Peter Betts
Posts: 966
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:38 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Unread postby Peter Betts » Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:12 pm

Hedrus wrote:Price for 500 F4 IS as of today at latest exhange rates are R57000.00
I am also aware of a used one at R45000.00 excellent condition.
Somebody will bring it to me Thursday.


Gee Hedrus thats cheap for SA prices.The Nikon non IS version @B&H is $ 7200.00 is R56200 and as per all Nikon stuff to get the full RSA retail price just take a calculator and X2 = R112400!!! Eina!!!
2009
Punda Maria Sept 27,28
Bateleur Sept 29,30 (free award)
Tamboti Oct 1,2,3,4
Biyamiti Oct 5,6,7,8

FGASA Local Area Guide

Nikon D700 FX, Nikkor 24-70 G f2.8, Nikkor 70-200VR f2.8, Nikkor 200-400 VR f4, Nikon 1.4 & 1.7 Convertors

Hedrus
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:54 am
Location: Pretoria SA

Unread postby Hedrus » Tue Oct 10, 2006 9:39 pm

yeah some Nikon stuff are way expensive (not all)
Its interesting, I got a client who has top notch Nikon equipment and when he wanted a long lens (he has lots of Nikon Lenses) he decided to go for the Canon 500 IS with a 30D body since its cost him less than a Nikon 500.
He says he couldn't be happier with his decision.

User avatar
Peter Betts
Posts: 966
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:38 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Unread postby Peter Betts » Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:18 pm

Interesting Hedrus. Photographers like Daryl Balfour used to use the Nikon 500 f4 but now like me has changed to the 200-400VR f4 zoom which is really like a 600f4 with Nikons crop factor of 1.5X Tell your Nikon client with the Canon 500 to try this lens. !!! its superb. Ive only had mine for a month but I wonder how I managed without it before I got it.
2009
Punda Maria Sept 27,28
Bateleur Sept 29,30 (free award)
Tamboti Oct 1,2,3,4
Biyamiti Oct 5,6,7,8

FGASA Local Area Guide

Nikon D700 FX, Nikkor 24-70 G f2.8, Nikkor 70-200VR f2.8, Nikkor 200-400 VR f4, Nikon 1.4 & 1.7 Convertors

Hedrus
Posts: 16
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:54 am
Location: Pretoria SA

Unread postby Hedrus » Tue Oct 10, 2006 10:28 pm

O yes Peter I totally agree. I sold lots of these lenses and a lot of my friends who shoot Nikon uses the 200-400.
I even took a D2X with 200-400 on my recent Chobe trip. (I use Canon 300 f2.8 and 600 F4)
I am absolutly all for the 200-400. I wish Canon made such a fine lens.
I had the customer in here with me testing the 200-400 and the 500 canon right next to each other but he still prefered the 500 for the distance.
The thing is according to him, and I do agree, is that if you are after the smaller birds there is still no compromise for length. Even my 200-400 buddies are keeping their 600's but most of them sold or are selling their 300 f2.8's
Both off course could be used with great success with 1.4 extenders.

User avatar
Peter Betts
Posts: 966
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:38 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Unread postby Peter Betts » Wed Oct 11, 2006 6:50 am

I agree Hedrus I was taking shots of Red Bishops at the bird hide at Addo last saturday and even though I was close I needed more for sure.
2009
Punda Maria Sept 27,28
Bateleur Sept 29,30 (free award)
Tamboti Oct 1,2,3,4
Biyamiti Oct 5,6,7,8

FGASA Local Area Guide

Nikon D700 FX, Nikkor 24-70 G f2.8, Nikkor 70-200VR f2.8, Nikkor 200-400 VR f4, Nikon 1.4 & 1.7 Convertors


Return to “Wildlife Photography Enthusiasts”