Skip to Content

Questions & Comments about the cams

Discuss the Orpen (KNP), Satara (KNP), Addo and Nossob (KTP) webcams
User avatar
DinkyBird
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 46474
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 5:54 pm
Location: Across the Equator, otherside the Atlantic

Unread postby DinkyBird » Sun Oct 16, 2005 6:51 pm

Hi Cath - I always reserve comment on issues like this as I have little scientific background. I do believe that Nature should be left to runs its course as much as possible.

I have noticed that man made water troughs in Kruger have "steps" moulded in the concrete and I have always assumed this was to enable animals to reach the water. I have also noticed most toughs never are filled to the top all the time.

Another thought - are animals not very nervous to drink if a predator is about?
Sawubona
Dalene

User avatar
Jakkalsbessie
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Posts: 530
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:00 pm
Location: At work longing for the outdoors!

Unread postby Jakkalsbessie » Tue Oct 18, 2005 1:44 pm

On Wednesday 12 October 05 Jakkalsbessie wrote:
DuQues wrote:Between Bouf and me you will have seen almost all pics taken... :lol:

:lol: and Bosnimf's pic's from the road! She's there and watching it right now...


So here is Bosnimf's pic from the road...

Image

And here is a pic of the cam (right) and spotlight (left):

Image
Be more concerned with your character than your reputation. Your character is what you really are while your reputation is merely what others think you are.
Please help save Mapungubwe NP - Facebook page

User avatar
Wild@Heart
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Posts: 2130
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 6:51 am
Location: In a very busy place

Unread postby Wild@Heart » Tue Oct 18, 2005 1:58 pm

Same Giraffe ...

View from KNP
Image

View from Cam
Image

Wonder which one I'll take ....
NO TO HOTEL DEVELOPMENT IN KRUGER

User avatar
Elsa
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 13604
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 6:31 pm
Location: Ballito, KZN North Coast, South Africa

Unread postby Elsa » Tue Oct 18, 2005 4:39 pm

I was wondering the same thing about how "safe" the water troughs were for the animals.

I seem to remember there being an incident some time ago where a baby elephant got stuck in just such a trough and was abandoned by its mother.

We have also, just the other day seen an impala slipping and having to be helped to its feet by the rangers at our own WH.

Maybe animals with hooves are more vunerable than say paws but I am just guessing.

Interesting one.
Where ever you go, go with all your Heart.

Please add your vote in the Website Community Choice Award

User avatar
Cath
Posts: 61
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2005 11:57 pm
Location: Saffa in the Caribbean

Unread postby Cath » Tue Oct 18, 2005 6:57 pm

It is an interesting debate, and I don't think there's a right or wrong answer, or an easy solution.

I can understand using concrete - it prevents seepage into the ground and loss of precious water in times like these - the other option is a mud-hole - they could get stuck, and precious water would be lost.

If only there was a simple answer. . . .

But I am pleased to see the water level back up again - that is another debate in itself the poor environmental managers have to face - of all the waterholes they maintain, which ones do the keep going, and which ones must be left to dry, because they can't do all of them in times of drought and water restrictions.

Well done KNP, you seem to be doing well in the face of adversity.

User avatar
Jakkalsbessie
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Posts: 530
Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 12:00 pm
Location: At work longing for the outdoors!

Unread postby Jakkalsbessie » Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:55 am

As promised yesterday, here is the pic showing the giraffe at the WH together with the cam...

Image
Be more concerned with your character than your reputation. Your character is what you really are while your reputation is merely what others think you are.
Please help save Mapungubwe NP - Facebook page

User avatar
Danie
Guru
Guru
Posts: 493
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 4:42 pm
Location: South African National Parks (SANParks)

Unread postby Danie » Mon Oct 24, 2005 5:07 pm

Jakkalsbessie wrote:In about five hours time this morning (Monday 24 Oct’05), the waterhole was filled from almost empty by the looks of it, to almost full. Where does the water come from?
Surely the Timbavati is dry, except if it is a pump under the sand or is there a strong borehole, presumably also supplying the camp & Marula & Tamboti ?

Hi JB
The water is pumped from a nearby underground source (borehole) by a pump. The water is thus not from the river or rain but is physically pumped to the waterhole from the nearby borehole.
Regards

Danie Pretorius
Manager: Information & Communications Technology (ICT)
South African National Parks (SANParks)

User avatar
swanepoel
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 6:21 pm
Location: Stellenbosch, South Africa

position of cam

Unread postby swanepoel » Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:05 pm

The position of the cam seems 'just that bit too far'. We seldom had to post queries about what we are seeing, yet lately, I read many 'is that a lion, leopard' or ' is that a ...? posts. Can the camera possibly be moved closer to allow easier identification?

User avatar
Wild@Heart
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Posts: 2130
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 6:51 am
Location: In a very busy place

Re: position of cam

Unread postby Wild@Heart » Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:51 pm

swanepoel wrote:The position of the cam seems 'just that bit too far'. We seldom had to post queries about what we are seeing, yet lately, I read many 'is that a lion, leopard' or ' is that a ...? posts. Can the camera possibly be moved closer to allow easier identification?


Hi swanepoel,

I'll pass on your request.
NO TO HOTEL DEVELOPMENT IN KRUGER

User avatar
michaela
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2005 6:35 pm
Location: Germany

Unread postby michaela » Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:16 pm

I thought the same, the camera on the old WH was much closer.
For "newbies" like me it is often impossible to identify the animals (except ellies and giraffes :wink: ).
Would be fine if there were a possibility to put it a bit closer.
Best wishes,
Michaela

User avatar
NightOwl
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 370
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 3:52 pm
Location: Port Elizabeth

Unread postby NightOwl » Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:07 am

Is it my imagination or is the cam alot clearer? More colour saturation as well.
It looks Great :D
Can't wait to see it closer...

User avatar
Danie
Guru
Guru
Posts: 493
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 4:42 pm
Location: South African National Parks (SANParks)

Unread postby Danie » Fri Oct 28, 2005 2:51 pm

michaela wrote:I thought the same, the camera on the old WH was much closer.
For "newbies" like me it is often impossible to identify the animals (except ellies and giraffes :wink: ).
Would be fine if there were a possibility to put it a bit closer.

We thought about changing the lens but that might cause problems with focusing and depth of field- especially at night when a large aperture is needed. The cam will be moved a bit closer to the waterhole next week. Will keep you up to date...
Regards

Danie Pretorius
Manager: Information & Communications Technology (ICT)
South African National Parks (SANParks)

User avatar
Danie
Guru
Guru
Posts: 493
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 4:42 pm
Location: South African National Parks (SANParks)

Unread postby Danie » Mon Oct 31, 2005 10:07 am

The webcam is about to be moved a bit closer to the waterhole this morning. It will thus be down for a while. It will be up and online again shortly!

We apologise for the inconvenience caused (e.g. withdrawal symptoms for not having the cam for the next hour or so!)
Regards

Danie Pretorius
Manager: Information & Communications Technology (ICT)
South African National Parks (SANParks)

User avatar
Wild@Heart
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Posts: 2130
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 6:51 am
Location: In a very busy place

Unread postby Wild@Heart » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:35 am

For the newer members who did not see the previous waterhole.

Image
NO TO HOTEL DEVELOPMENT IN KRUGER

User avatar
Danie
Guru
Guru
Posts: 493
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 4:42 pm
Location: South African National Parks (SANParks)

Unread postby Danie » Mon Oct 31, 2005 11:54 am

toffee wrote:When you go and work near the drinking hole to fix the cam etc do you need to take guns for your own safety???


Animals are usually scared off by the activity and human presence, etc. when an activity like this takes place. You could see how quickly the animals returned to the watehole when the team left!

When fieldwork is done, a ranger(s) with a rifle(s) is usually accompanying teams for safety reasons.
Regards

Danie Pretorius
Manager: Information & Communications Technology (ICT)
South African National Parks (SANParks)


Return to “Webcams”