wildjohn wrote:
It is unfortunate that people are killed by elephants, but it is a risk that one takes to undertake that venture involving indeminities etc.
One human killed ...oooh shame.. - there have been many more elephants killed at the hands of man I tell you..
w
In a way, I agree with you wildjohn. Human's are so far ahead of all other animals in our intelligence (and other aspects) that we should know better than to mess with 'wild' animals. However, the tourists who may go on these elephant safari's are often given a false sense of security - they are on holiday after all and, if their plane doesn't crash, they are otherwise relatively safe from serious mishap? Signing an indemnity form does not actually make most people truly aware of the potential dangers of betting close to wild or tamed-wild animals.
I know, I have signed enough of these and watched other, less experienced tourists signing them with a nervous smile but signing nevertheless without asking relevant, in-depth, questions about the potential risks. After all, these things only happen to other people don't they - just like the plane crash?
The staff who work with wild animals in Africa, on the other hand, often realise the risks involved but sometimes have little choice if they want to feed their families.
As far as 'wild' horses being tamed is concerned, they have a different temperament to elephants, making them much easier to domesticate and breed for their good temperament, as with what are now domestic dogs and cats, and are much smaller and therefore less likely to cause such terrible and usually fatal injuries.
It should be noted that attempts to 'tame' Burchell's Zebra (
Equus burchelli) to take tourists have consistently failed, which tells you that not all
Equus (horse) species are tamable!