Skip to content

SANParks.org Forums

View unanswered posts | View active topics






Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 16
 [ 230 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 16  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: General Photography Chat
Unread postPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:11 pm 
Offline
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:41 pm
Posts: 1538
Location: Gauties .
Brilliant stuff , awesome photos .
Deffinately need to get that 100-400IS for myself .
Time to go rob a bank methinks !

Edit by DB - this topic was split from Bert's trip report


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:42 pm 
Offline
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:35 pm
Posts: 575
Bucky, 18K? I just bought the Canon 75-300mm and it was less than 3k, or is their such a vast difference between the two?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 7:52 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 5:54 pm
Posts: 41995
Location: Somerset West, Cape Town
pardus wrote:
Bucky, 18K? I just bought the Canon 75-300mm and it was less than 3k, or is their such a vast difference between the two?

Yip Pardus Bucky is correct, I am paying pretty close to that for my 100-400 which is due to arrive this week :dance:

_________________
Sawubona
Dalene

A roaring lion does not catch any prey - African Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:20 pm 
Offline
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:41 pm
Posts: 1538
Location: Gauties .
pardus wrote:
Bucky, 18K? I just bought the Canon 75-300mm and it was less than 3k, or is their such a vast difference between the two?


Pardus , If you can , put another 3k in the bag and get the same lens in IS , it has a 3 stop image stablilizer , which is pretty good .If not I found my canon 70-300 on the 350d to be a fine combo for the park , if you look in my satara report , those owls and the hyena pic where all with the 70-300 (5 years old)

I think , looking at berts pics , that there is no comparisson between that , and the 170-500 sigma I bought , even my old 70-300 seems better than the sigma .
Berts pics have so much colour and clarity !

Yvonne was taking pics of the same ellies and girafes as me in the park (We met up and where searching for cheerah on the s28 in convoy) , i would love to compare her pics with the 100-400 to mine with the 70-300 and sigma 170-500


Last edited by bucky on Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 8:27 pm 
Offline
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:02 pm
Posts: 17053
Location: mind in SA, body in The Netherlands
bucky wrote:
Berts pics have so much colour and clarity !

Bucky, the clarity is lens quality but the colour is helped with a little bit of photo shopping.
Depending on the colour already created by light in which the picture was taken i ad saturation with 10-15%
The shot of the hill with the marble rock is natural, but the giraffe has a little bit of saturation added to it.

_________________
Submit your Images


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:00 pm 
Offline
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:41 pm
Posts: 1538
Location: Gauties .
DB , I have the 350d , just got it before my trip (The day before) .

I am very happy with pic quality from my canon 70-300 , and mixed with the 1,6x effect of the 350d makes a very effective lens .

I cant say im overly happy with the sigma 170-500 on it , and anything that was medium/far away has not got sharp results , even in a window clamp with remote release , so no shake .
I dont know if the dust/heat haze causes issues on long shots with a bigger lens .

Id go for the 70-300 with or without is depending on what you can afford , if he has 18k spare get the 100-400 , or else a 400mm canon L lens , although this leaves him with no short range option .
I would without a doubt buy the 70-300IS for 6k before the sigma 170-500 at a little more cost .
I have got the 55-200 usm canon lens also , and this is a little small for most shots .

I have used a 70-300 for years on my old film camera , as I was not able to afford anything bigger , and all previous photos I posted where with this lens scanned from slides or pics .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:11 pm 
Offline
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:02 pm
Posts: 17053
Location: mind in SA, body in The Netherlands
pardus wrote:
:hmz: Plastic surgery....I'm a shocked puritan :shock: Guess what I'm doing with my next batch of Kruger pics.



Its like a bit of lip gloss or eyeshadow :wink:
But why have a program like photoshop for eg. if you dont use it. :shock:

I mainly use four tools

Bit of saturation of needed
Highlight/shadow.
Sharpening (only a little if needed. A out of focus or moving object will never be sharp)
And sometimes i cut away a bit of the edges if a branch or bit of grass annoys me.

Nearly forget. Polish away the ugly dusts which comes when changing lenses on one digital body.

_________________
Submit your Images


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:15 pm 
Offline
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 10:35 pm
Posts: 575
Bert, you are precious! - Eyeshadow and lipgloss nogal! You are in my opinion, a very good photographer because your pictures have soul.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:16 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 5:54 pm
Posts: 41995
Location: Somerset West, Cape Town
Because I am going to have a 100-400L lens he was thinking more in the line of a 300mm lens. Thanks bucky for your help!

_________________
Sawubona
Dalene

A roaring lion does not catch any prey - African Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:27 pm 
Offline
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:02 pm
Posts: 17053
Location: mind in SA, body in The Netherlands
DinkyBird wrote:
Because I am going to have a 100-400L lens he was thinking more in the line of a 300mm lens. Thanks bucky for your help!


I also own a 300 4.0 L lens
Never disappointed me
And with a 1.4 converter still able to use auto focus.

My friend bought a 450 5.6 L which is taken out of production and was on sale. The leopard in the tree was his image.
Have seen his pictures and quality and sharpness was perfect.

Know a few photographers owning this lens and they are all very satisfied.

You even might find it on the second hand market

@Pardus. Txs, i try to add a bit of the shivers of the precious moments in mother nature.

_________________
Submit your Images


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:36 pm 
Offline
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:02 pm
Posts: 17053
Location: mind in SA, body in The Netherlands
DinkyBird wrote:
Bert can you use auto focus on the 100-400 with a 1.4 convertor?


No :?

But with a subject not moving and with aid of a rice bag or tripod you can still make good shots
The darter pic was taken with the 1.4 converter from a tripod

_________________
Submit your Images


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 9:46 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 5:54 pm
Posts: 41995
Location: Somerset West, Cape Town
Ok, thanks Bert - I had been told that but I wanted to just make sure.

Your photos really inspire me - I have so much to learn and maybe oneday I will get into your league. You really do have the x factor when it comes to making a special pic!

_________________
Sawubona
Dalene

A roaring lion does not catch any prey - African Proverb


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Some of my photos from the trip to Kruger
Unread postPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 5:26 pm
Posts: 2
Image

This one is a little fuzzy when viewed at 100%. What can I do to over come that in the future? Is there any way of fixing it with out sharpening?

Image

Image

I used a Canon EOS 350D with a Sigma 70 - 300mm

Your comments and suggestions will be appreciated.

Thanks

Ivr


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:13 pm 
Offline
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:02 pm
Posts: 17053
Location: mind in SA, body in The Netherlands
Hi and welcome
Did you use a bean bag or any other kind of rest
The fuzzy part looks like a minor shake

_________________
Submit your Images


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Sep 13, 2006 9:19 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 5:26 pm
Posts: 2
No free hand. Just learned about beanbags last week. Will try it in the future. Still very new in the game.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 230 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 16  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

Webcams Highlights

Addo Nossob Orpen Satara
Addo Nossob Orpen Satara
Submitted by Ang at 05:07:35 Submitted by grannyb at 21:35:53 Submitted by Anonymous at 15:50:48 Submitted by enrico at 04:42:11