Skip to Content

Should the names of members banned be made public

Tell us what we can do better, need to clear the air, voice your concern or provide feedback about the forum

Should the names of people banned be made public on the forums?

Poll ended at Tue Aug 16, 2011 5:32 pm

Yes
57
63%
No
33
37%
 
Total votes: 90

User avatar
Stark
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
Posts: 2248
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 1:52 am
Location: Arizona, USA

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Stark » Sun Aug 14, 2011 8:29 pm

Great Elzet, now we're going to have a "mods" page of smilies. :tongue: :rtm: :thumbs_up:
"Smooth seas do not make skillful sailors." West African Proverb

User avatar
TonyP
Posts: 114
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 8:36 pm

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby TonyP » Sun Aug 21, 2011 5:57 pm

What pupose would it serve? The naming of banned mites, I mean :lol: :lol: :lol:

User avatar
wanda
Guru
Guru
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 9:02 am
Location: PRETORIA

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby wanda » Tue Aug 23, 2011 1:39 pm

Richprins wrote:I'm just curious about what happens on Tuesday 16 at 5:32 pm precisely!?




What? Will RP be banned finally? Oh my! Peace at last. :D :dance: LOL

Interesting discussion and only RP got cleaned up by the parents. Well behaved children. :clap: ROFLOL

But seriously though, to defend the poor Mods, I think that we need to accept that anyone who is put in a position of authority is never very popular with everyone. All of us always retain the "teenager" in us and want to rebel against "authority". I take the point that some people feel that a none Mod forumite might make people feel comfortable with the decisions made by the Mods, but how long will this last? How long will it take for this person to be labelled as lapdog to the Mods? I also believe that there is no need for a panel or forum. The Mods are doing a good job on their own and besides Admin and myself are always there to look at an appeal if it is justified. Unfortunately a couple of months back someone wrote to us to appeal a banning and instead took the opportunity to swear at us. Very odd.
wanda mkutshulwa
Head of Communications
South African National Parks (SANParks)

Richprins

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Richprins » Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:51 pm

Hello, Wanda, and nice to see you on the forums again! :thumbs_up:

As you quoted me, I shall respond as follows:

To continue your analogy, I have abundant experience of teenagers, being a teacher, and have found that parents are to blame for most problem children!

This could be either too much or too little discipline, for example, and the mods are doing a fine job, I agree!

But I don't know if they are the "parents" here, and most forumites are not children? :wink:

I don't quite understand the rest of your post regarding the topic...so what is your opinion on banned members being named?

User avatar
DinkyBird
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 45328
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 5:54 pm
Location: Somerset West, Cape Town

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby DinkyBird » Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:59 pm

Hi everyone - the poll closed a week ago and the mods would like to thank everyone for their comments, input and votes. :clap:

The forum admin will take all opinions into consideration and take a decision on whether banned members' names will be made public or not.
Sawubona
Dalene

User avatar
joekin
Posts: 1169
Joined: Mon May 05, 2008 1:32 pm
Contact:

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby joekin » Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:25 am

you should name them.

Its not shaming to be banned.
Last edited by SANParks Moderator on Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: See rule # 18 & 12 & 14

Bush Happy
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:53 am

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Bush Happy » Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:28 pm

Agree with joekin!

Name them.

Any forumite worth his/her salt will know the reason they were banned and therefore in some instances, there is no shame(even honour!!!)

For instance, my opinion is that recent bannings came about because the mites were passionate about conservation, and spoke out against certain issues!

User avatar
DuQues
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 17941
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby DuQues » Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:33 pm

The forumites banned very well know the reasons, don't worry about that. This is about hanging out the dirty laundry for all to see, or not. And remember, not everyone uses an alias, quite a few use their own name.
So it's easy to find if you google a person. Now that is done very often by companies when people apply for a job. And then the chances of them getting a job suddenly look bleaker.
Arriving currently: The photos from our trip! Overhere! :yaya:

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c

Bush Happy
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:53 am

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Bush Happy » Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:41 pm

Are you for real DuQues??????

You seriously need to get a grip!!!

Bush Happy
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:53 am

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Bush Happy » Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:44 pm

My question was deleted in RP's thread(that was deleted/censored) but I will ask it again:

How often is a Moderators performance reviewed??

User avatar
Baffers
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 2042
Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 10:13 pm
Location: Slightly Off Center
Contact:

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Baffers » Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:46 pm

Bush Happy wrote:Are you for real DuQues??????

You seriously need to get a grip!!!


You need to check yourself. Thats out of line.
You gotta be careful: don't say a word to nobody about nothing anytime ever!
I don't pretend to be captain weird. I just do what I do.

User avatar
Baffers
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 2042
Joined: Tue May 09, 2006 10:13 pm
Location: Slightly Off Center
Contact:

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Baffers » Wed Aug 24, 2011 1:52 pm

DuQues is correct.

If you work for any job that requires security clearance they check you down to the size of your underpants... They know EVERYHTING. Your credit ratings, how many fines you have had against your name, your tax standing, and yes they google you inside out. Just to figure out what you might do if you are in a position of responsibility.

You telling him to "get a grip" is indicative of bad manners. If you don't agree then by all means say so but don't be belligerent.
You gotta be careful: don't say a word to nobody about nothing anytime ever!
I don't pretend to be captain weird. I just do what I do.

User avatar
Brummie
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 485
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 3:32 pm
Location: Birmingham - UK (the original and still the best!)

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Brummie » Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:05 pm

Bush Happy wrote:
Any forumite worth his/her salt will know the reason they were banned and therefore in some instances, there is no shame(even honour!!!)

For instance, my opinion is that recent bannings came about because the mites were passionate about conservation, and spoke out against certain issues!


Ever thought that it was the way they spoke out that caused them to be banned?
"Birmingham people, you guys take care of us. We have to give you all the respect Birmingham."

(Usain Bolt August 2012)

User avatar
DuQues
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 17941
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby DuQues » Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:06 pm

Baffers wrote:If you work for any job that requires security clearance they check you down to the size of your underpants... They know EVERYHTING. Your credit ratings, how many fines you have had against your name, your tax standing, and yes they google you inside out. Just to figure out what you might do if you are in a position of responsibility.

I had to fill in a form two weeks ago, which is for my security clearance. One of the questions is about nicknames on the internet.
Now my family, friends, pub etc can expect to have a visit, undercover or not, asking questions about me. My websites will be read, and my comments here too.
Arriving currently: The photos from our trip! Overhere! :yaya:

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c

Bush Happy
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 2:53 am

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Bush Happy » Wed Aug 24, 2011 2:12 pm

Sure have Brummie!

Lets take Forumite X, who was recently banned. He had a history on this forum of sharing and imparting his vast wealth of knowledge on matters relating to SANPARKS. He did extensive research and had some wonderful threads.

He was passionate!!

Then, an issue arose that he felt was worth speaking out against.

He was branded a 'purist, a 'rascist' etc in the public media, not just on these forums.

So, it's fair to say he felt slightly aggrieved.

So, because he was passionate about conservation, SANPARKS are considering naming and shaming him, and as DuQues has threatened, will have a trouble finding a job??


Return to “Chill Room ”