Skip to content

SANParks.org Forums

View unanswered posts | View active topics






Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 6
 [ 82 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Teleconverters/extenders
Unread postPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 1:21 pm 
Offline
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Posts: 17943
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?
ceruleanwildfire wrote:
Scruff, you realise you have just made me extremely jealous. 800mm, enough to take a picture of a tick smiling on the butt of a buffalo from a mile away. Seriously jealous.

Shall I make it even worse? :twisted:
800mm plus the 20D's cropfactor is 1280 mm....

_________________
Arriving currently: The photos from our trip! Overhere! :yaya:

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 1:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 5:22 pm
Posts: 135
Location: Born and Bred in SA, Living in NZ
DuQues wrote:
Shall I make it even worse? :twisted:
800mm plus the 20D's cropfactor is 1280 mm....


And even worse, add a 2x convertor giving you 2560mm. Take a picture of a mite smiling on the butt of a tick smiling on the butt of a buffalo from a mile away. Depressing really.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Oct 12, 2005 6:52 pm 
Offline
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:48 am
Posts: 864
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
ceruleanwildfire wrote:
DuQues wrote:
Shall I make it even worse? :twisted:
800mm plus the 20D's cropfactor is 1280 mm....


And even worse, add a 2x convertor giving you 2560mm. Take a picture of a mite smiling on the butt of a tick smiling on the butt of a buffalo from a mile away. Depressing really.


Talk about go big or go home. Now, could someone tell me how far that thing can zoom?? In meters?

Don't you get less than 2x with the converter? something like 1.6 instead??

_________________
Operation "Duke" Member

Being African is not determined by race, but by what's in your heart


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 8:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 5:22 pm
Posts: 135
Location: Born and Bred in SA, Living in NZ
Loams wrote:
Don't you get less than 2x with the converter? something like 1.6 instead??


Depending on your camera make and model you can get a 1.4x and 1.6x or 1.7x convertor.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 10:10 am 
Offline
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 1:38 pm
Posts: 1935
bert wrote:
Scruff wrote:
I am using a Sigma 300-800 on my 20D and have not experienced any problems (although I always underexpose by 1/3 stop anyway). Actually the quality of pics with this lens is superb. Just a bit of a dog to handle (5.8 kg)


Protruding from the vehicle :wink:

As long as there is no belt around the lens that sticks out of the window Scruff will be fine :D

_________________
"The measure of life is not its duration but its donation." - Peter Marshall
www.flickr.com/groups/birdssa


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 2:03 pm 
Offline
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:48 am
Posts: 864
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
francoisd wrote:
As long as there is no belt around the lens that sticks out of the window Scruff will be fine :D


:funny:
ceruleanwildfire wrote:
Loams wrote:
Don't you get less than 2x with the converter? something like 1.6 instead??


Depending on your camera make and model you can get a 1.4x and 1.6x or 1.7x convertor.


Sorry CWF, I meant with a 2x converter you don't get full 2X conversion, you get something like 1.4 or 1.6 with the actual 2x converter. Is this true?

Also how many meters does that lens with converting (roughly) bring the object closer??

_________________
Operation "Duke" Member

Being African is not determined by race, but by what's in your heart


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Thu Oct 13, 2005 2:13 pm 
Offline
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Posts: 17943
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?
Loams wrote:
Sorry CWF, I meant with a 2x converter you don't get full 2X conversion, you get something like 1.4 or 1.6 with the actual 2x converter. Is this true?

No. You get the quoted amounts, so 1.4 times with the 1.4, 2x with the 2x converter. The 1.4 will cost you one, and the 2x converters two stops of light. Something to keep in mind, as most camera's lose autofocus above f/5.6, and some (like the EOS 1 series) above f/8.
Loams wrote:
Also how many meters does that lens with converting (roughly) bring the object closer??

Not a single nanometer. Good thing, imagine someone using it on the moon, and we wake up to find it nearly on top of us! :lol:

_________________
Arriving currently: The photos from our trip! Overhere! :yaya:

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 2:04 pm 
Offline
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 3:54 pm
Posts: 217
Location: A little village in Gaul
Bought the Canon Powershot S2 quite a while ago. Thinking about buying Canon’s 1.5X telephoto converter (with adapter) – I need, as always, as much zoom as I can afford.

I thought Canon’s 1.5X telephoto converter was the only option for the S2. However, was told over the weekend by "reliable" shop that you can buy, for less, a generic 2x converter (to be used with the Canon adapter on the S2) and that it works just as well (with the extra zoom as a bonus). Does anyone know about these generic converters and whether they will work specifically on the S2 as well? Any other suggestions would be appreciated as well (good idea / bad idea?). I’m just concerned I might run into trouble if I buy it, seeing as it is not a Canon converter? Also, I assume I’m going to lose light with the converter, but will the image stabiliser still work?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:13 pm 
Offline
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 1:59 pm
Posts: 85
Location: Cyprus
8) Teleconverters as they are also known do vary in quality a bit but if you go for a good name like for instance Tamron or similar then the quality is pretty good. I have used one in the past and found the results good.

_________________
WE have the ability to control nature....and destroy it quicker than ever before.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Fri May 19, 2006 4:34 pm 
Offline
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:02 pm
Posts: 17053
Location: mind in SA, body in The Netherlands
In europe we can buy
Soligor and Kenko convertors for all brands
But they dont have the same image quality as the originals
Soligor isnt to bad

_________________
Submit your Images


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: The teleconverters topic
Unread postPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 4:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 4:11 pm
Posts: 2
Canon 300mm IS 4.0 with 1.4X converter or Canon 400mm 5.6 (no IS) I am looking at buying one of these two setups. They are both about the same cost. Both are "L" series lenses. Looking mostly at amateur bird photography as well as general wildlife. Any comments or suggestions?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Thu Jun 01, 2006 7:41 pm 
Offline
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2005 7:55 pm
Posts: 303
Location: Schoenmakerskop (near Port Elizabeth)
My wife has the 300 f/4.0 IS L & I have the 400 f/5.6 plus 1.4x & 2x converters. With the copies that we have (remember, every lens varies, even L lenses QC is not 100%) the 400 slightly shades the 300 in IQ and with the 1.4 attached there is a definite IQ difference in favour of the 400. Of course, the 400 doesn't have IS but it is probably the best hand-holder-able lens for bird photography. Both lenses have great contrast and clarity with lightening fast AF. Check out www.fredmiranda.com for reviews and you will notice that, apart from Canons 600 F/4.0, these 2 lenses consistently score tops in users' reviews of longer lenses.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 8:41 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 10:22 am
Posts: 94
Location: gauteng
Danie

Canon 300mm IS 4.0 with 1.4X converter will give you 420 mm which is better than 400, and at 420 it is eqw to 12 x optical zoom, you would wish you had is, so go for the one with is !!!! or you might get blurry shaky pics all the time


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Fri Jun 02, 2006 9:50 am 
Offline
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:02 pm
Posts: 17053
Location: mind in SA, body in The Netherlands
A friend of mine, coming to Kruger with us, bought the 400 5.6
Brilliant optics and light to handle. The big difference imo is the IS. My friend always uses the lens from a tripod,except in Kruger, and doesnt find a need for IS.

_________________
Submit your Images


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Does 1.4x converter change a lens' minimum focusing distance
Unread postPosted: Fri Jun 09, 2006 4:08 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2006 4:11 pm
Posts: 2
Does adding a converter (either a 1.4x or 2x) change a lens' minimum focusing distance? Any answers?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 82 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

Webcams Highlights

Addo Nossob Orpen Satara
Addo Nossob Orpen Satara
Submitted by Sebakwe at 08:45:56 Submitted by Anonymous at 11:39:20 Submitted by Mellory at 10:45:03 Submitted by Anonymous at 11:37:00