Skip to Content

Please Help With Lenses

Discuss and share your wildlife photography, filming and equipment
User avatar
Massimo
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:34 pm
Location: Edenvale

Help with lenses please

Unread postby Massimo » Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:22 am

Hi All i have been looking for a good second hand lens and i have found to for a realatively good price both can get for R5000 second hand tho!

They are as follows :

sigma 100-300f/4 for canon

Sigma 170-500mm f/5-6.3 APO for Canon EOS

can you please help me and tell me which one is better value for money?
I have a Canon 450D body and i would love to use this lens to get crisp photos of wildlife as wildlife is my passion!

Kind Regards!!
Canon 5D MK III :) :), Canon 7D , Canon 450D | Canon 400 F5.6 L | Canon 70-200 F2.8 L IS|Sigma 10-200 EX DG OS F4-5.6 & goodies :)
Runner up wildlife photographer of the year 2012-sunday times & winner-Canon S.A. reflection category

User avatar
michel367
Posts: 4756
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:44 am
Location: On the edge of heaven

Re: Help with lenses please

Unread postby michel367 » Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:26 am

That is a difficult one Massimo.
Opinions will vary on this matter and will be very confusing.
I would, even have done so last year, go for both, but the prices are a bit on the high side for second hand mechanise.. :thumbs_up:

User avatar
Josh of the Bushveld
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1904
Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:15 pm
Location: Johannesburg - too far from the closest Sanpark

Re: Help with lenses please

Unread postby Josh of the Bushveld » Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:31 am

Prices do seem a little high?
Have you ever used either?
Think I'd go for the 170-500mm for wildlife.
(Though I'd investigate using the shorter one with a teleconverter)
The 'mite formerly known as joshilewis

FGASA Level 1 Guide

Glen Reenen TR

15-18 June: Berg-en-dal

User avatar
Massimo
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:34 pm
Location: Edenvale

Re: Help with lenses please

Unread postby Massimo » Mon Jul 19, 2010 11:36 am

I have not used any of these lenses before as i still only have the standard one that comes with the camera the 55-200 i think. :hmz: :hmz:

I got them as a package! Where would you guys recommend i look for a good second hand one? Not sure if i can mention it here but iv been looking at www.odp.co.za (abbreviated just in case) ?
Canon 5D MK III :) :), Canon 7D , Canon 450D | Canon 400 F5.6 L | Canon 70-200 F2.8 L IS|Sigma 10-200 EX DG OS F4-5.6 & goodies :)
Runner up wildlife photographer of the year 2012-sunday times & winner-Canon S.A. reflection category

User avatar
RUMURUTI
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1868
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 11:54 pm
Location: Milano (Italy) - IT ALL STARTED WITH A FOOTSTEP!

Re: Help with lenses please

Unread postby RUMURUTI » Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:05 pm

Hi Massimo, I'd go for the 150-500 any time.
It gives you that extra reach for wildlife that you wouldn't have with a 100-300 mm.
I use Nikon and use an 80-400 mm and there are times I'd love to have an extra 100 mm on my lens.
"You can leave Africa but Africa never leaves you"
LIFE IS MADE OF GOOD AND BAD THINGS, I TAKE THE GOOD AND YOU CAN KEEP THE BAD!!!
Andy Benaglia

User avatar
DuQues
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 17941
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?

Re: Help with lenses please

Unread postby DuQues » Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:14 pm

Massimo wrote:Not sure if i can mention it here but iv been looking at http://www.odp.co.za (abbreviated just in case) ?

And that doesn't work, this does: http://www.outdoorphoto.co.za/

RUMURUTI wrote:Hi Massimo, I'd go for the 150-500 any time.

Note that the lens in the first post is the 170-500, which is quite a different lens.

That lens is good, the two lenses in the first post are mediocre at best. I would suggest passing on them, it's going to set you back R5000 and you'll never be really happy with them.
Rather buy the 170-500, which you may find for the same price?
Arriving currently: The photos from our trip! Overhere! :yaya:

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c

User avatar
michel367
Posts: 4756
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:44 am
Location: On the edge of heaven

Re: Help with lenses please

Unread postby michel367 » Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:17 pm

DuQues wrote:
RUMURUTI wrote:Hi Massimo, I'd go for the 150-500 any time.

Note that the lens in the first post is the 170-500, which is quite a different lens.

That lens is good, the two lenses in the first post are mediocre at best. I would suggest passing on them, it's going to set you back R5000 and you'll never be really happy with them.
Rather buy the 170-500, which you may find for the same price?


Didn't you just make the same mistake? :hmz: :whistle:

User avatar
Massimo
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:34 pm
Location: Edenvale

Re: Help with lenses please

Unread postby Massimo » Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:29 pm

:hmz: :hmz: im getting confused between the two of you lol! the two lenses are as follows :


sigma 100-300f/4 for canon

Sigma 170-500mm f/5-6.3 APO for Canon EOS

I have read Rumuruti and i agree that the extra length is good so im actually not keen on the 100-300 any more!

SO my question is :

is the Sigma 170-500mm f/5-6.3 APO for Canon EOS any good!?! and if not what would you rather recommend??
Canon 5D MK III :) :), Canon 7D , Canon 450D | Canon 400 F5.6 L | Canon 70-200 F2.8 L IS|Sigma 10-200 EX DG OS F4-5.6 & goodies :)
Runner up wildlife photographer of the year 2012-sunday times & winner-Canon S.A. reflection category

User avatar
michel367
Posts: 4756
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 10:44 am
Location: On the edge of heaven

Re: Help with lenses please

Unread postby michel367 » Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:32 pm

I have the 170 - 500 and so has Sprocky (Have a look at his photo's).
It is not a world-class lens, but it is good value for money.
The 150 - 500 is definitely better, but also a lot more expensive.
I guess it all depends on what your skill is and what you want to spend on it.
Just go to a shop.
Test a few lenses and make your choice. :lol:

Told you that you were going to get confused. :twisted:

Sprocky
Posts: 2159
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 8:51 am

Re: Help with lenses please

Unread postby Sprocky » Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:34 pm

Massimo, take a look at my thread titled "My in and out favourite shot of the day", in Travel Tales. 90% of the pics are taken with my 170-500, see what you think. :wink:

User avatar
noel
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 810
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Johannesburg

Re: Help with lenses please

Unread postby noel » Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:04 pm

Massimo

Not an expert on these things, I do photography purely as a hobby. R5000 is very high for a 170-500mm lens- I have one, and I paid R2500 for it second hand and that was a few years ago.

But certainly, if you are going to get one of these two options, go for the 170-500mm. The previous owner of mine was a wildlife photographer in Botswana, and he mentioned that he used it mostly for the bat-eared foxes. He was very happy with it, as am I.

Otherwise sout around a bit-you may get a better bargain with some patience and persistence.

Cheerio

Noel

User avatar
DuQues
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Honorary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 17941
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:42 pm
Location: Red sand, why do I keep thinking of red sand?

Re: Help with lenses please

Unread postby DuQues » Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:47 pm

michel367 wrote:Didn't you just make the same mistake? :hmz: :whistle:

Aaaarggghhh! :wall:

Yep! :lol:
Arriving currently: The photos from our trip! Overhere! :yaya:

Feel free to use any of these additional letters to correct the spelling of words found in the above post: a-e-t-n-d-i-o-s-m-l-u-y-h-c

User avatar
Massimo
Posts: 237
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2008 2:34 pm
Location: Edenvale

Re: Help with lenses please

Unread postby Massimo » Mon Jul 19, 2010 2:12 pm

Just did some research about the product not many people have stock of it e.g. catz digital and camerastuff etc... I was told that the lens is not a good one and sigma has taken it out of the market?? I was also told that i have to have a tripod or bean bag as this lens has no IS? is it true ? I have a possible source to get it for around R3000 new! but still working on it! Where can i actually test one ? I stay in Edenvale JHB! If anyone lives close and has one please let me know and maybe you will let me come see it :whistle: :whistle: and take a few pictures with it!

Ta for all your advice!! it is really appreciated! he he throw a spanner in the works and ask which you would go for it is was the 150-500 and the 170-500.
Canon 5D MK III :) :), Canon 7D , Canon 450D | Canon 400 F5.6 L | Canon 70-200 F2.8 L IS|Sigma 10-200 EX DG OS F4-5.6 & goodies :)
Runner up wildlife photographer of the year 2012-sunday times & winner-Canon S.A. reflection category

User avatar
noel
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 810
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 1:13 pm
Location: Johannesburg

Re: Help with lenses please

Unread postby noel » Mon Jul 19, 2010 3:28 pm

Hi Massimo

Spanners in the works :naughty: :naughty: Go for the 150-500.

have you tried Kameraz in Rosebank-always worth a try for second hand stuff.

Cheerio

Noel

User avatar
Mike1916
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1500
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 2:43 pm
Location: Sungulwane Hills Game Lodge, Hluhluwe

Re: Help with lenses please

Unread postby Mike1916 » Mon Jul 19, 2010 6:11 pm

Massimo

I would definitely say the 150-500 as it has stabilization where as the 170-500 does not, as a canon user myself i don't know what I'd do without my IS on my 100-400, i have tested the 150-500 on my camera and was very impressed, good focusing and feels great in the hands, a bit on the heavy side at 1.9 Kg but pros out way the cons!
Sustainability is not something we do in addition to..........., it is about the manner in which we do everything


Return to “Wildlife Photography Enthusiasts”