Tabs wrote:
Leopards do not decide when or whether they will be seen - to suppose so you are being anthropamorthic (SP?) - as leopards, like all other wild animals only do what they do by instinct. They ar incapable of making a decision to 'be seen' by tourists or other animals.
And I have to disagree here

... How do they avoid lions or other enemies in an area then, or know that they must hide their infants? I agree with Tourists maybe because they do not see this us as a threat ... Mind you ... I remember some field rangers who almost jumped on a "hiding leopard" ..
Tabs wrote:
I also disagree that the leopard would be the most probable member of the big 5 to turn you into stroganof! This would only be the case if you were unlucky enough to be walking in the bush with an old or sick leopard in your immediate area.
You know ... this is debatable (sp?)..
More leopards who are hurt or old have entered camps to hunt ... I can recall 3 people who have been killed by leopards. I would have to ask Oom Louie about this one .. being the one that had to catch leopards in camps and had to deal with a leopard who killed a Gate Guard.
The only thing I think that might seem to make the leopard less likely for this category is because more people have survived a leopard attack.
Tabs wrote:
anthropamorthic
HUH?
Forget the spelling ... I have no clue what that means ... so that might be my downfall..
I cannot argue the Hippo's with you as you are 100% right! As well as the Black Rhino and Daggaboys!
In fact the Daggaboys are the most respected in terms of space by Rangers ... They know these old guys are skin filled with trouble ... If they are in a good mood they will charge you ... if they are in bad mood they will charge you ...
Best bet is to stay away from them and avoid them ...
The ultimate rule is : The only predictable thing of an animal is it's unpredictability ... I've learned that from Bruce Bryden ... and I believe those words through and through