Skip to Content

Should the names of members banned be made public

Tell us what we can do better, need to clear the air, voice your concern or provide feedback about the forum

Should the names of people banned be made public on the forums?

Poll ended at Tue Aug 16, 2011 5:32 pm

Yes
57
63%
No
33
37%
 
Total votes: 90

User avatar
DinkyBird
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 46108
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 5:54 pm
Location: Across the Equator, otherside the Atlantic

Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby DinkyBird » Tue Aug 02, 2011 5:32 pm

This is a poll to gauge how you, our forum members, feel about the moderators listing members who are are banned, and the period of the ban, in a locked topic on the forums.

Should the names of members who are banned be made public on the forums while the ban is effective?
Sawubona
Dalene

User avatar
Elzet
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 7460
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:37 pm
Location: Daar waar die bobbejane hul borshare kam

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Elzet » Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:37 pm

Hiya DB


I would say yes, but subject to the consent of the member involved, as privacy law comes into play. I also think it would be cause for speculation as to the reason(s) for banning, which might not be a fruitful exercise/opening up another hornests' nest. Just my 0,00002c worth.
“Life is too short to wake up with regrets. So love the people who treat you right. Forget about those who don’t.” - Harvey MacKay

User avatar
missings.a.!
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1159
Joined: Tue Jul 21, 2009 2:52 pm
Location: London

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby missings.a.! » Tue Aug 02, 2011 7:43 pm

JMO, I don't think names should be made public by Sanparks, but the banned forumite should be given the option to reveal they have been banned and perhaps why, as long as it is done in a way that does not solicit forumites to draw battle lines. We have enough fall outs as it is. :)

Personally, I amazed at some of the complaints on this Forum. Some of those with a thin skin should try working in investment banking. :big_eyes:

Richprins

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Richprins » Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:06 pm

DinkyBird wrote:This is a poll to gauge how you, our forum members, feel


I voted no, as it is against the spirit of a rule to discuss/speak on behalf of banned members, I think!?

So maybe change the rule?


But I LOOOVE this idea of polls!!!!


(75% of voters for revealing names so far!)

Scipio
Posts: 4758
Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2007 11:22 am

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Scipio » Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:19 pm

:whistle: :whistle: :whistle: I voted yes, cause, well, at least you guys are willing to put a poll up for such a tender topic. But, maybe have those bannned allowed to just post their feelings here, obviously cencored by the mods, what the feelings is from them.
:whistle: :whistle: :whistle: :whistle: :whistle:

User avatar
Stark
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
Posts: 2256
Joined: Mon May 26, 2008 1:52 am
Location: Arizona, USA

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Stark » Tue Aug 02, 2011 8:22 pm

I voted yes, simply so I don't find myself asking "whatever happened to so-and-so??" and finding out that I've wandered outside the perimeter.

I think it would also help put the banning frequency perception to bed. Even with the recent grouping of dearly departed, banning non-spammers seems to be a very rare thing. My 2 cents US (which is getting weaker by the day)
"Smooth seas do not make skillful sailors." West African Proverb

User avatar
cheetah2111
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
FAC Member (2013)
Posts: 4776
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 9:51 am
Location: Johannesburg SA

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby cheetah2111 » Tue Aug 02, 2011 11:05 pm

I voted yes.

If I were banned, I would like all my forum friends to know the reason I am not here, is not because I don't like the forums, but rather that it was forced :thumbs_up:

Sure it might open up a hornets nest, but it will be a more transparent system :thumbs_up:
Kruger 2014!!!

16-23 August - Lower Sabi!!!!

User avatar
dikdikkie
Posts: 62
Joined: Tue May 17, 2011 5:45 pm
Location: Alberton S.A.

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby dikdikkie » Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:21 am

I voted no. If it was my name in question, I would not like my name appearing on an open forum. I know that when I am banned, I do not have access on the forum and therefore, I would not have the opportunity to defend the interpretation as to what led to my banning.

For me personally, it's how precious people are. This just feels like a NAME AND SHAME procedure. A procedure where I will receive a label as to whatever I did wrong. There are labels that just don't get forgotten.

If the peeps that were banned, can be given the opportunity to vote, I do not think they would all vote YES. Even if you KNOW in your heart you have been treated unjustly, banning is not something we print in Bold letters. Forgive me for raising my honest opinion and feeling the hurt of some peeps.

I love the Poll system and maybe this is a great leap forward. Maybe we can start addressing other questions in this way.
Strong convictions precede great actions.
JF Clarke

Skukuza - 09-14 April 2012

User avatar
Meandering Mouse
Legendary Virtual Ranger
Legendary Virtual Ranger
FAC Member (2013)
Posts: 15819
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: meandering between senility and menopause

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Meandering Mouse » Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:33 am

Very sensitive topic, indeed.

I voted "yes", which is against my usual spirit.

The reason I voted "Yes"
.. people are not "just banned", there is a process involving warnings
.. everyone who comes onto the forum signs onto a code of conduct. A violation of that code is a choice made by that particular person
.. we do not use our real names, this ensures a certain amount of privacy. Unfortunately it has also given some people carte blanche to "act out" like delinquents.
.. I have been witness to some of the damage done by some members. Goodwill is dearly bought and when lost, it might be forever.
.. there is a perception in some quarters that the mods are "power drunk" and "enjoy" weilding a stick. This perception needs to be challenged.

Accountability is a much needed feature to ensure good governance.

I would say, if this becomes a feature in the forums, that it is clearly stipulated in
the rules.
The bird doesn't sing because it has answers, it sings because it has a song.

User avatar
anne-marie
Legendary Virtual Ranger
Legendary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 9502
Award: Forumite of the Year & Travel Tale of the Year, Other Parks (2013)
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:36 pm
Location: Lausanne (Switzerland)

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby anne-marie » Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:41 am

:hmz: yes for the transparence... and to know if one person is no more here... because... a decision... good or not
It is only with the heart that one can see rightly, what is essential is invisible to the eye
Le Petit Prince

planing KTP janv/fev.2016

User avatar
TheunsH
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 2387
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 9:14 am
Location: Pretoria, South Africa

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby TheunsH » Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:26 am

I have voted yes. Most of us conceal our true identity by using user-names, so there are no real privacy/identity issues here.

For instance, when I'm banned and my user-name is linked to a ban, who is going to know who TheunsH really is and the masses who don't know me would in any case not feel anything about it!?

User avatar
Weltenman
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1026
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:11 pm
Location: Here...there, somewhere, where's my GPS?

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby Weltenman » Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:27 am

Just a question for the mods, when you "name and shame" the members, do you mean you will post their real names on the forums, or just the forum names?
Study the past, if you would divine the future.
Confucius

User avatar
JenB
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Posts: 18217
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 1:41 pm
Location: Johannesburg - where they cut down trees and name streets after them.
Contact:

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby JenB » Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:31 am

Posting someone else's real name is against the rules so no, only forum names. :wink:
"Until one has loved an animal, a part of one's soul remains unawakened." ~ Anatole France

User avatar
DinkyBird
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 46108
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 5:54 pm
Location: Across the Equator, otherside the Atlantic

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby DinkyBird » Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:31 am

Just forum names. We do not know all the members' real names, nor to have access to them.
Sawubona
Dalene

User avatar
bert
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Distinguished Virtual Ranger
Posts: 17189
Joined: Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:02 pm
Location: mind in SA, body in The Netherlands

Re: Should the names of members banned be made public

Unread postby bert » Wed Aug 03, 2011 9:32 am

Forum names only


Return to “Chill Room ”