Skip to Content

THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Management

Discuss current issues and events happening in the parks.
User avatar
Riverrat
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2007 8:46 am
Location: Alberton, South Africa
Contact:

THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Management

Unread postby Riverrat » Mon Apr 15, 2013 10:27 am

This open letter to the SAN parks Board of Directors is a serious effort to call them to review their policy of expansion. Although these are my words, they reflect the feelings of many hundreds of thousands of South Africans, some of who have asked to review it before I published it here. I do not doubt that this Letter will quickly be censored off the SAN Parks Forum, but this would not be wise as my words here only echo those already extensively discussed on other Forums including Facebook, 4x4 Community, Hilux 4x4 Forum, Pajero Forum, the various sightings groups, and several overseas and local tourism discussion groups.
A wise man listens to what his clients have to say:


OPEN LETTER TO THE DIRECTORS OF SAN PARKS:
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen
National Parks were initially founded to maintain parts of our country in their original state for prosperity: that means that they are meant to be in exactly the same condition in 2000 years and 4000 years from now for South African citizens OF ALL RACES of that time to appreciate. These RESERVES are for them to understand what Africa looked like before the times of urbanization and development!

This establishment was:
1. The fundamental reason these reserves were proposed and protected by Paul Kruger and other wise men of that time;
2. The intention of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Amendment Act 31 of 2004; the National Environment Laws Amendment Act 14 of 2009; and the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Amendment Act 15 of 2009. (These Acts were not the ONLY rule to be followed, they were established as a guideline to be used in the case of conflicting opinion.)
3. Affirmed by The Earth Charter created by the Independent Earth Charter Commission, as a follow-up to the 1992 Earth Summit and formally endorsed by thousands of organizations, including UNESCO and the IUCN (World Conservation Union), and subscribed to by SAN Parks!
4. A socialist philosophy supported by the vast majority of all races of citizens of South Africa.

As the South African Government dictates these above Acts and Laws, and the Government has a responsibility to preserve all aspects of our heritage for Prosperity, to be appreciated in its ORIGINAL STATE, and so the SA GOVERNMENT has a responsibility to FUND the absolute majority of that preservation. It is a NATIONAL HERITAGE: The whole nation should contribute to it’s preservation as a much larger part of the NATIONAL BUDGET, not just the visitors.

Unfortunately as these Acts are legal documents, not philosophies, they were not created to highlight the fundamental SPIRIT and REASON why the world as a whole creates reserves and protected wilderness areas: they may only specify the legal aspects. These Environmental Acts are not the entire “charter”.

The South African National Parks:
1. Should NOT be required to provide the bigger share of that funding; (currently SAN Parks is 80% self-funding!)
2. Should NOT cut up sections in piecemeal and the perimeter 3km be “sold off” to concessions for “Recreational Use”. (With an inner South African border of 520 km, the Revised Zoning Plan adopted recently will forfeit nearly 1500 of KNP’s 18 989 sq km, and this excludes the private hotel concessions who have already consumed significant areas with their infrastructure and game-viewing tracks clearly visible on Google Earth. )
3. Should NOT be used as a fund-raising operation where the values are sacrificed in order to raise funds in order to survive financially.
4. Should NOT be seen as a commercial enterprise in the form of more roads, private lodges and the proposed Malelane hotel project for the exclusive use of rich minority and the executive board members, and for the financial benefit of a very few already rich investors.

It is just this perception that has encouraged poachers on the boundaries, and business entrepreneurs to perceive that the National Parks, (including rhino horns ) is “FOR SALE”. Poor villagers on the perimeter cannot afford to visit these rich havens and now scorn them, and instead HONOUR the poachers who bring rhino horns and cash-flow to their communities.

The SPIRIT of why National Parks were established is what should be seen as THE BOTTOM LINE! It seems to me that the Directors of SANParks and Dept. of Environmental Affairs and Tourism have totally lost the plot of WHY RESERVES WERE FOUNDED. Almost every visitor to the Kruger National Park, and scores of people who don’t, can see that our leaders and administrators lack insight and wisdom by allowing themselves to be so easily influenced by narrow-focussed researchers and the money-hungry TOURISM MACHINE. Instead of seeing the errors of the past developments, and attempting to reverse these mistakes, they say “hotels have already been approved in the past” and then canvass for EVEN MORE tourism!!

THE FUNDAMENTAL “WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER….it is fast becoming a “Gold Reef City” funfair. In a recent visit to Ireland, people I spoke to there say it will soon be no more than a “Disneyworld theme park”. They no longer want to come and see it as they feel it is no longer a wilderness, but now “an exclusive collection of expensive tourist hotels and open jeeps in a bunch of traffic jams not unlike Cape Town”

Once the areas have been encroached upon, and the soil turned, and bricks laid, that land has been inhabited, and from this THERE IS NO RETURN. Once you build lodges, you have to support them with staff and associated infrastructure…..the origin of entire towns!!

ARE YOU REALLY GOING TO ALLOW THIS?

I do not ask for a verbal reply. I beg you to search and discuss it within yourselves, and hope that in time, we will be able to see nature return to this once wilderness.

Yours sincerely
Dr. Kevin Azzie
Alberton

http://www.wildernessfoundation.co.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=66:the-earth-charter&catid=16:resources&Itemid=29
Dr. Kevin Azzie

RESERVES were declared to keep natural areas in their wildest form.
KEEP IT THAT WAY!!



15 Mar: Satara
21-23 March: Shingwedzi
18-21 April Balule
9 May: Sand River Bush Camp

threedogs
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1046
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 6:20 am

Re: THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Manageme

Unread postby threedogs » Mon Apr 15, 2013 11:53 am

I wholeheartedly endorse these sentiments. Thank you for posting. :gflower:
NO TO TRADE IN RHINO HORN!

User avatar
Micetta
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 9542
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:56 pm
Location: CH - Lugano

Re: THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Manageme

Unread postby Micetta » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:08 pm

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :thumbs_up:

User avatar
Canis Lupus
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2012 10:40 am
Location: Snorcity, Gauteng

Re: THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Manageme

Unread postby Canis Lupus » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:17 pm

I support this open letter 100% :thumbs_up:
"The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated." - Mahatma Ghandi

User avatar
Grantmissy
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
FAC Member (2013)
Posts: 7190
Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 9:21 am
Location: SA

Re: THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Manageme

Unread postby Grantmissy » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:17 pm

Riverrat thank you for sharing your beliefs and thoughts on nature conservation.

In my personal opinion there is nothing more miserable, destructive and unfortunate than to take out the pure simplicity and the “wild” out of nature "to make it more attractive for people".
Everything in moderation, including moderation – Oscar Wilde

User avatar
ndloti
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 4958
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:45 pm
Location: southern gauteng

Re: THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Manageme

Unread postby ndloti » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:30 pm

:thumbs_up:

My signature echoes your thoughts , Dr Azzie .
KNP is sacred. I am opposed to the modernisation of Kruger and from the depths of my soul long for the Kruger of yesteryear! 1000+km on foot in KNP incl 56 wild trails.200+ nights in the wildernessndloti-indigenous name for serval.

kite
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 818
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:15 pm

Re: THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Manageme

Unread postby kite » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:34 pm

A strong case put forward. Food for thought !
It's not just fanatics on the web making a fuss!

User avatar
Duke Ellieton
Posts: 4688
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 6:13 pm
Location: Centurion, ZA

Re: THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Manageme

Unread postby Duke Ellieton » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:35 pm

:thumbs_up:

and from Sharifa too :thumbs_up:

User avatar
Rooies
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 2930
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 3:44 pm
Location: Welkom

Re: THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Manageme

Unread postby Rooies » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:46 pm

I am on this side of the fence as well.
Give thanks for unknown blessings already on its way---African saying
Member nr 8512
Cheetah supporterPURIST and proud thereof

User avatar
Duke Ellieton
Posts: 4688
Joined: Mon Jun 19, 2006 6:13 pm
Location: Centurion, ZA

Re: THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Manageme

Unread postby Duke Ellieton » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:53 pm

I find this quote

Our national parks are not just ecological geographical landscapes or playgrounds for the elite


Hard to reconcile with a cycle challenge that would have cost R4000 per head first time round, or with a spa for diplomats.

I find this quote hard to reconcile with the pricing strategy

We must begin mobilising support for national parks from the broad mainstream of society – from the squatter camps of our townships, deep rural villages from Venda to the Transkei, to the leafy suburbs of our towns and cities. Public proprietorship or support for national parks in South Africa remain skewed in favour of those who enjoyed them previously. People living in townships and rural areas are still excluded (by financial means and attitudes) and attempts to bring these folks on board continue to be opposed by the same anti-transformation lobby.


If the people we want to attract are excluded by finacial means I don't see anything SANParks is doing to change this. Don't accuse some anti-transformation lobby - what have SANParks doneabout this. We ahve had 19 years to make a change. The above two activities seem geared to attract elitists.
Last edited by Duke Ellieton on Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Bush Baptist
Legendary Virtual Ranger
Legendary Virtual Ranger
Posts: 9941
Award: Funniest/Best Forumite Name (2013)
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 12:38 pm
Location: In the shadow of Table Mountain

Re: THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Manageme

Unread postby Bush Baptist » Mon Apr 15, 2013 12:58 pm

I agree with almost all of it. Maybe the wording should have been for Kruger where appropriate, but one tiny correction.

that means that they are meant to be in exactly the same condition in 2000 years and 4000 years from now for South African citizens OF ALL RACES of that time to appreciate.


I would like to see '4000 years from now for the whole world to appreciate'.

We that live here and have a responsibility to ensure our neck of the woods is not destroyed, like I expect to see polar bears, tigers, foxes, whales in their natural habitat when visiting. It is up to the locals there to do their bit as well.
Whatever (according to BB): "You are correct but I don't want to admit it".

User avatar
Tumble Weed
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 287
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2008 2:19 am
Location: In the wind...

Re: THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Manageme

Unread postby Tumble Weed » Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:16 pm

I wholeheartedly agree. Well said :clap: :clap: :clap:

I don't want to nitpick for the sake of it, but can we make one slight correction please :lol: :lol:

Change
National Parks were initially founded to maintain parts of our country in their original state for prosperity


to

National Parks were initially founded to maintain parts of our country in their original state for posterity



'Prosperity' may imply for the generation of wealth and I would hate for anyone to think our parks were there to create wealth for themselves, or their organisation. 'For posterity' means to preserve for future generations.

okie
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1664
Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:29 am
Location: Worcester , Cape

Re: THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Manageme

Unread postby okie » Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:23 pm

Riverrat , well said :clap:

Now let use this as a rally call in the words from the South African National anthem :

.........sounds the call to come together,
And united we shall stand,
Tread softly , and let your departure not be spoiled by the damage of your arrival

Next :
3 - 6 Sept 2013 - Punda.
7 - 10 Sept 2013 -Shingwedzi .
11 - 13 Sept 2013 - Balule .
14 - 17 Sept 2013 - Satara .

User avatar
Weltenman
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 1026
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 11:11 pm
Location: Here...there, somewhere, where's my GPS?

Re: THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Manageme

Unread postby Weltenman » Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:40 pm

I agree with the letter in that is should not be the responsibility of SANParks to fund its own expenses, in an ideal world. It seems a bit perplexing sending this letter to SANParks as it is not they who decide the amount of funding they receive, that would be the SA Government, maybe the letter is addressed to the wrong entity? Just a few facts about the current situation where we find ourselves:


R305 000 to R431 000 per annum. Link

60% below R575 per month.Link

4 600 000 without clean water.Link

The first is the average annual income of current visitors. The second is the amount of children in South Africa living in poverty and their monthly income per member of the family (R27 600 per annum). The third is also a constitutional right of every South African.

So whilst I would like the current SANParks board to have the financial freedom of previous boards, the current economic climate does not permit this.
Study the past, if you would divine the future.
Confucius

User avatar
ndloti
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
Posts: 4958
Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:45 pm
Location: southern gauteng

Re: THE "WILD” IS WILD NO LONGER: An Open Letter to Manageme

Unread postby ndloti » Mon Apr 15, 2013 1:55 pm

............

Most countries have seen the light when in preserving wild places .
Last edited by JenB on Mon Apr 15, 2013 2:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Political content removed.
KNP is sacred. I am opposed to the modernisation of Kruger and from the depths of my soul long for the Kruger of yesteryear! 1000+km on foot in KNP incl 56 wild trails.200+ nights in the wildernessndloti-indigenous name for serval.


Return to “Forum Indaba”