Skip to content

SANParks.org Forums

View unanswered posts | View active topics






Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 63
 [ 933 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 63  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Jun 15, 2005 11:28 pm 
Offline
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 150
Location: UK
elpaco wrote:
I have a question for you

when a lion eats, it gets blood all over the face.
I was wondering how he did manage to clean its fur afterwards.
I expect them not to like water (and soap :lol:) too much, so ???
do they rub on grass ?


rooibok is right - lions, like all cats, will clean themselves by licking their paws and washing their faces with them. I have also seen lions licking blood from each other - a form of allo-grooming which is part of the bonding process with some mammals.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Fri Jul 01, 2005 9:51 pm 
Offline
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 6:51 am
Posts: 207
Location: Vanderbijlpark
Just returned from the Kruger and for the third time saw the same unusual animal - LIT - but before someone tells me I shouldn't post this under lions... in this case LIT refers to "Lion-in-Tree".
What I found interesting is that all three my sightings of lions in trees were in the same area - Vurhami, just north of Croc Bridge camp.
My first sighting was of two lionesses sleeping on a big, low branch.
That was in Dec 2002.
According to the day walk/ night drive ranger at that time, the lionesses had babies and she thought they wanted to get away from the cubs for a while and therefore climbed into the tree ?
During July 2003 we saw two sub adults on a night drive in that same area, playing and chasing one another.
They both jumped into a tree in their effort to escape the other.
Now for the third time have we seen a lion in a tree and again in the Vurhami area.
This time ( Tuesday 27th June) a lioness was again sleeping on a big, low branch in a tree just off the H4-2 bridge over the Vurhami river.
I know lions do sometimes climb into trees, but I find it unusual that I've seen them in trees on three occasions in this specific area.
Could it be an acquired skill that is passed on from one generation to the next in this area, or is it just coincidental that I've never seen it elsewhere?
Any suggestions ?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 6:14 am 
Offline
Legendary Virtual Ranger
Legendary Virtual Ranger
User avatar
Award: Birder of the Year (2013)
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 10:27 am
Posts: 5294
Location: Chasing down the rarities
Hi herman, I have also only had one LIT and that too was a lioness in a tree. A collared one nogal.

It too was seen with a big pride of about 13 individuals north of Croc Bridge in 2002.

Interesting!!! :wink:

_________________
656
Latest Lifer(s): White-winged Flufftail, Dickinson's Kestrel, Senegal Coucal, Three-banded Courser, African Broadbill, Thrush Nightingale, Rufous-bellied Heron.

Follow me as I bird on Twitter @wildtuinman


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: lions
Unread postPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 8:10 am 
Offline
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 3:06 pm
Posts: 174
Location: Nelspruit
It does appear to be a culturally acquired behaviour. There is a population of lions in the Serengeti in Tanzania that are known by their behaviour to regularly climb and sleep in trees. There it is thought that they do it to escape the attention of troublesome flies. This behaviour has been passed on from mothers to cubs and has become a distinctive " cultural" feature of this lion population.

_________________
A Leopard in a Fevertree, one day......


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Jul 06, 2005 10:53 pm 
Offline
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 3:40 pm
Posts: 272
In the UK on Channel 5 this evening, there was a program which showed home video footage of a guy in the Kruger about 5 years ago filming a large male lion which had separated from the pride with a female to mate. The lion was becoming increasingly irritated with the closeness of the vehicle, mock charging it once.
Soon after, it lost patience and launched itself at the vehicle - the engine was off, so the electric window didn't work.
Only the fact that the lion's head was larger than the window prevented the occupants from being mauled.
The video was taken by the guy in the car that was attacked.
In fairness, he was a genuine Kruger and animal lover and wasn't doing anything to purposefully agitate the lion, but he didn't read the signals that the lion was uncomfortable with the vehicle's proximity.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 7:11 pm 
Offline
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 403
Location: Neither here nor there.
From what I understand/read is that lions generally move between prides of females within their territory. This way they spread their particular genetics widely. A book I have refers to a couple of prides dominated by two male brothers, location Botswana. They patrol a large area, mating and then staying with a particular pride of lioness and then moving on. Whilst these lions are on patrol nomadic males have access to their prides, with varying success, eventually leading to a territorial fight. So I wouldn't say the behaviour is geographical. They have fights over territory, and since theirs is already established it is usually younger upcoming males challenging them and not them challenging other lions for additional females.

Sorry its sunday and my brain is on awol, excuse the scattered thoughts!

bwana

_________________
All your snakes are belong to us.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 8:51 pm 
Offline
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 20, 2005 8:48 am
Posts: 864
Location: Johannesburg, South Africa
That is correct, Pride males can have many female groups under their wing. A coalition of males move between their prides at regular intervals. Perhaps spend a week or two at each before moving on, not years, as they will then probably lose their females to other males.

I also am not sure how regularly a Lioness comes into oesterus, especially after having a litter, but I am very sure it is sooner than 3 years after giving birth.

_________________
Operation "Duke" Member

Being African is not determined by race, but by what's in your heart


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Sun Jul 31, 2005 8:59 pm 
Offline
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 10:16 pm
Posts: 57
Location: JHB
Females typically will be in oestrous about every two years, except when a lioness has her cubs killed by a male that has just taken over her pride as this will bring her back into oestrous

_________________
The popular argument for destroying rather than protecting snakes is lack of knowledge, and yet there is no valid excuse for this - Austin James Stevens


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 6:42 pm 
Offline
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 8:11 pm
Posts: 447
Location: Somewhere in the Bush
The average interval between birth and the next estrus is 530 days (Not before cubs are one and a half yrs old)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Lion behavior question
Unread postPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 9:50 pm 
Offline
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2004 11:21 pm
Posts: 150
Location: UK
vkalia wrote:

One question thugh - our official Kgalagadi guide mentioned an interesting behavior about pride lions. It says that they stay with a particular group of lionesses tills the cubs are 2-3 yrs old (ie, old enough to look after themselves), and then move on to another pride. In the meantime, other wandering lions come and start mating with this group of lionesses. The stated reason for this is that the lionesses dont come into estrus for 3 yrs after having cubs, and by moving on, the lions maximize their chances of reproductive success.

I was always under the impression that once a male coalition takes over a pride, they stay till they are forced out. Behaviorally speaking, moving like this doesnt seem to maximize reproductive success, as it increases the chances of encountering other pride lions whose cubs have NOT reached adolescence.

What gives? A behavior trait specific to Kgalagadi lions, due to the particular conditions there?

Cheers,
Vandit


It's always a shame when Guides get their facts a bit skewed - and I think this has happened here - I am not aware that the lions in the Kgalagadi behave any differently to lions anywhere else in Africa?

The males normally stay with a pride (or prides if there are more than one in their territory) for 2 - 3 years; usually they take over their first pride between the age of 5 and 7, until they are forced out by younger, stronger males.
Male lions in the wild only live to around 10 years of age, so by the time they have been with a pride for a couple of years they may be getting pretty old in lion years.

Lions defend their territories - and their prides - fiercely and there is not a lot of chance of 'wandering males' mating with the pride without a fight!
The attached male(s) are not only likely, in most cases, to hear the intruding males (as a lion's roar can be heard from up to 8km away) but may detect them through their scent marking and will rush to defend the pride.
The females will also put up a fight as the intruding male will attempt to kill all the cubs before trying to mate with the females.

The only chance that nomadic males would have of mating with a pride which already has attached males is if the attached males are too far away to detect their presence, which could happen in large sparsely populated areas where territories are larger, or if the attached male(s) are too old, weak, sick to successfully defend their pride in which case the incomers would then defeat them and take over the pride until they are, in turn, displaced.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Mon Nov 21, 2005 8:57 pm 
Offline
Moderator
Moderator
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 6:31 pm
Posts: 9485
Location: Ballito, KZN North Coast, South Africa
After watching several wildlife programmes it would also appear that lions prefer not to eat any hyenas that they happen to kill.

If this is correct, I would be interested to know if this is just certain prides in particular areas or the general trend overall.

I know there is very little "love lost" between the two species.

_________________
Where ever you go, go with all your Heart.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Tue Nov 22, 2005 9:16 am 
Offline
Senior Virtual Ranger
Senior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2005 11:41 pm
Posts: 1538
Location: Gauties .
Lions will kill any competing species they can get there paws on , its a case of survival of the fittest , and the less competition around , the better for them .
It isnt a case of them killing for food , and it happens in all
areas , and with all prides.
This is why chettah and wild dog tend to try and avoid areas
highly populated with lions .

I suppose hyena get killed the most due to there involvement
in kills with lions , and similarity in "life styles" .
As a matter of interest , hyena are not always the ones trying to rob the lions of there kill , and it is very often the other way around , with hyena being very succesfull hunters.

On the bush pig issue , maybe its because bush pig is a very rich tasting meat (Apparently) , also very hairy , so possibly doesnt go down to well as far as lions are concerned.
Why they relish warthogs but not bush pigs is a bit on the
funny side as far as im concerned seing as they are quite similar species :?:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Dec 21, 2005 6:26 pm 
Offline
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 10:41 am
Posts: 627
Location: The country of compromises
On my last visit to Kruger (november) when on a nightdrive from Letaba I learned something quite interesting about Kruger lions.

According to the guide there is a clear difference in size between lions in the south and center of the park and lions in the north of the park. This is prey related! In the north lions feed mainly on buffalo. it doesn' take speed to hunt them but strength. Northern lions have adapted by gaining strength and size but loosing speed over the course of history.

In the south and center it's the other way around. Because lions there feed mainly on zebra and wildebeest they are faster than their northern cousins but what they gained in speed they lost in size.

When asked for confirmation by me of this remarkable theory, the guide told that when they measure lions throughout the park this theory is indeed confirmed!

_________________
U lacht en U heeft gelijk dat U lacht maar het is niet om mee te lachen


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:02 pm 
Offline
Virtual Ranger
Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2005 3:28 pm
Posts: 653
Location: Bloemfontein, RSA
According to the census, the lion population declined from 2000 tp 1500.

My guess would be bovine TB is taking its toll. (note guess, not fact).

I saw a 50/50 episode where they said (I am putting a lot of faith in my memory here, hope I am factually correct) lion males die at an earlier age and new ones take their place. Like normal they kill the cubs, but before next litter of cubs are old enough to fend for themselves, the male becomes weak with disease and a new male takes over, repeating the process.

Maybe Sanparks can enlighten us.

_________________
To change ones life start immideately. Do it flamboyantly. No exceptions.


Last edited by christo on Wed Jan 04, 2006 10:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
Unread postPosted: Wed Jan 04, 2006 10:44 pm 
Offline
Junior Virtual Ranger
Junior Virtual Ranger
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 08, 2005 2:27 pm
Posts: 148
Location: Sir Lowry's Pass
christo wrote:
According to the census, the lion population declined from 2000 tp 1500.

My guess would be bovine TB is taking its toll. (note guess, not fact).


Christo I tend to agree that BTB does have some type of an impact on the lion population.

They took 16 BTB positive lions in the south of the park and 16 BTB negative lions in the north to see what the effects of bovine BTB are in lions.
After four years apparently the report showed that of the 16 southern lions, 12 have died.

Five died of BTB and seven died either through being attacked by other lions or shot when they left the park, possibly as a result of the apparent disruption of the pride structure when the other individuals died of advanced bovine BTB.

In the north, eight of the original study lions are still alive.

I am sure though that there are other factors contributing to the decline of the lion population.

_________________
Conservation is the lifeblood of nature!

West Coast National Park 22 November 2009


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 933 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 63  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group

Webcams Highlights

Addo Nossob Orpen Satara
Addo Nossob Orpen Satara
Submitted by Kiepersol at 17:13:54 Submitted by umkhulu at 21:35:16 Submitted by umkhulu at 23:40:25 Submitted by umkhulu at 23:08:04